TY - JOUR
T1 - Yet another parameter-free shape optimization method
AU - Swartz, Kenneth E.
AU - Mittal, Ketan
AU - Schmidt, Mathias
AU - Barrera, Jorge Luis
AU - Watts, Seth
AU - Tortorelli, Daniel A.
N1 - This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 and was supported by the LLNL-LDRD Program under Project No. 22-ERD-023. LLNL-JRNL-841196. The authors would like to thank Professor Mathias Wallin and Dr. Anna Dalklint of Lund University and Dr. Miguel Salazar de Troya of Corintis Inc. for invaluable suggestions throughout this work.
This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 and was supported by the LLNL-LDRD Program under Project No. 22-ERD-023. LLNL-JRNL-841196. The authors would like to thank Professor Mathias Wallin and Dr. Anna Dalklint of Lund University and Dr. Miguel Salazar de Troya of Corintis Inc. for invaluable suggestions throughout this work.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - The use of node coordinates as design variables in shape optimization offers a larger design space than computer-aided design (CAD)-based shape parameterizations. It also allows for the optimization of legacy designs, i.e., a finite element mesh from an existing design can be readily optimized to meet new performance requirements without involving a CAD model. However, it is well known that the node coordinate parameterization method is fraught with numerical difficulties, which makes it impractical to use. This has led to several of “parameter-free” shape optimization methods that seek the advantages and avoid the pitfalls of the naïve node coordinate parameterization method. These methods come in two main varieties: sensitivity filtering (or gradient smoothing) and consistent filtering. The latter is analogous to the density filter method used in topology optimization (TO). Herein, we use the PDE filter from TO and energy-based filters to implement consistent shape optimization filtering schemes easily and efficiently. Numerical experiments demonstrate that consistent methods are more robust than sensitivity filtering methods.
AB - The use of node coordinates as design variables in shape optimization offers a larger design space than computer-aided design (CAD)-based shape parameterizations. It also allows for the optimization of legacy designs, i.e., a finite element mesh from an existing design can be readily optimized to meet new performance requirements without involving a CAD model. However, it is well known that the node coordinate parameterization method is fraught with numerical difficulties, which makes it impractical to use. This has led to several of “parameter-free” shape optimization methods that seek the advantages and avoid the pitfalls of the naïve node coordinate parameterization method. These methods come in two main varieties: sensitivity filtering (or gradient smoothing) and consistent filtering. The latter is analogous to the density filter method used in topology optimization (TO). Herein, we use the PDE filter from TO and energy-based filters to implement consistent shape optimization filtering schemes easily and efficiently. Numerical experiments demonstrate that consistent methods are more robust than sensitivity filtering methods.
KW - Consistent filtering
KW - Node coordinate parameterization
KW - Shape optimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85177421299
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85177421299#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s00158-023-03684-9
DO - 10.1007/s00158-023-03684-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177421299
SN - 1615-147X
VL - 66
JO - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
JF - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
IS - 12
M1 - 245
ER -