Words and networks: How reliable are network data constructed from text data?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Social network data as well as the information produced or shared by network participants are prominent sources for studying reputation and authority in social media. Research studies on this topic often start with one or more network datasets and bring relevant substantive questions about socio-technical concepts such as the evolution of credibility to the data. This chapter deals with the reliability of network data itself and aims to shed some light on the following question: How reliable or accurate are network data depending on the data construction method for cases where text data are used as an input to this process? I provide a concise overview on some of the most common methods for constructing network data from text data sources, report on our findings from applying these methods to three corpora from different domains and genres, and derive implications and suggestions for theoretical and practical work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRoles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets
Subtitle of host publicationTheory and Methods
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages81-89
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9783319054674
ISBN (Print)9783319054667
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

data network
social media
credibility
reputation
genre
social network
Social Media
Text
Credibility
Social Networks

Keywords

  • Approach comparison
  • Metadata
  • Natural language processing
  • Network construction
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Mathematics(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Diesner, J. (2015). Words and networks: How reliable are network data constructed from text data? In Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods (pp. 81-89). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5

Words and networks : How reliable are network data constructed from text data? / Diesner, Jana.

Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 81-89.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Diesner, J 2015, Words and networks: How reliable are network data constructed from text data? in Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods. Springer International Publishing, pp. 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5
Diesner J. Words and networks: How reliable are network data constructed from text data? In Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 81-89 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5
Diesner, Jana. / Words and networks : How reliable are network data constructed from text data?. Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 81-89
@inbook{39a29ac6e1b34b55abe27c0d53366f02,
title = "Words and networks: How reliable are network data constructed from text data?",
abstract = "Social network data as well as the information produced or shared by network participants are prominent sources for studying reputation and authority in social media. Research studies on this topic often start with one or more network datasets and bring relevant substantive questions about socio-technical concepts such as the evolution of credibility to the data. This chapter deals with the reliability of network data itself and aims to shed some light on the following question: How reliable or accurate are network data depending on the data construction method for cases where text data are used as an input to this process? I provide a concise overview on some of the most common methods for constructing network data from text data sources, report on our findings from applying these methods to three corpora from different domains and genres, and derive implications and suggestions for theoretical and practical work.",
keywords = "Approach comparison, Metadata, Natural language processing, Network construction, Social network analysis",
author = "Jana Diesner",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319054667",
pages = "81--89",
booktitle = "Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Words and networks

T2 - How reliable are network data constructed from text data?

AU - Diesner, Jana

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Social network data as well as the information produced or shared by network participants are prominent sources for studying reputation and authority in social media. Research studies on this topic often start with one or more network datasets and bring relevant substantive questions about socio-technical concepts such as the evolution of credibility to the data. This chapter deals with the reliability of network data itself and aims to shed some light on the following question: How reliable or accurate are network data depending on the data construction method for cases where text data are used as an input to this process? I provide a concise overview on some of the most common methods for constructing network data from text data sources, report on our findings from applying these methods to three corpora from different domains and genres, and derive implications and suggestions for theoretical and practical work.

AB - Social network data as well as the information produced or shared by network participants are prominent sources for studying reputation and authority in social media. Research studies on this topic often start with one or more network datasets and bring relevant substantive questions about socio-technical concepts such as the evolution of credibility to the data. This chapter deals with the reliability of network data itself and aims to shed some light on the following question: How reliable or accurate are network data depending on the data construction method for cases where text data are used as an input to this process? I provide a concise overview on some of the most common methods for constructing network data from text data sources, report on our findings from applying these methods to three corpora from different domains and genres, and derive implications and suggestions for theoretical and practical work.

KW - Approach comparison

KW - Metadata

KW - Natural language processing

KW - Network construction

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944556168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944556168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_5

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84944556168

SN - 9783319054667

SP - 81

EP - 89

BT - Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -