Won't get fooled again: An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics

Sarah Laszlo, Mallory Stites, Kara D Federmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that semantic access is obligatory. Several studies have demonstrated that brain activity associated with semantic processing, measured in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), is elicited even by meaningless, orthographically illegal strings, suggesting that semantic access is not gated by lexicality. However, the downstream consequences of that activity vary by item type, exemplified by the typical finding that N400 activity is reduced by repetition for words and pronounceable nonwords but not for illegal strings. We propose that this lack of repetition effect for illegal strings is caused not by lack of contact with semantics, but by the unrefined nature of that contact under conditions in which illegal strings can be readily categorised as task-irrelevant. To test this, we collected ERPs from participants performing a modified Lexical Decision Task, in which the presence of orthographically illegal acronyms rendered meaningless illegal strings more difficult lures than normal. Confirming our hypothesis, under these conditions illegal strings elicited robust N400 repetition effects, quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those elicited by words, pseudowords, and acronyms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-274
Number of pages18
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Semantics
semantics
event
brain
contact
lack
Brain
Strings
Semantic Processing
Event-related Potentials
evidence

Keywords

  • ERPs
  • Lexical decision
  • N400
  • Semantic access

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Won't get fooled again : An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics. / Laszlo, Sarah; Stites, Mallory; Federmeier, Kara D.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2012, p. 257-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0b1f09420814c479f02b1dfcb98f72f,
title = "Won't get fooled again: An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics",
abstract = "A growing body of evidence suggests that semantic access is obligatory. Several studies have demonstrated that brain activity associated with semantic processing, measured in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), is elicited even by meaningless, orthographically illegal strings, suggesting that semantic access is not gated by lexicality. However, the downstream consequences of that activity vary by item type, exemplified by the typical finding that N400 activity is reduced by repetition for words and pronounceable nonwords but not for illegal strings. We propose that this lack of repetition effect for illegal strings is caused not by lack of contact with semantics, but by the unrefined nature of that contact under conditions in which illegal strings can be readily categorised as task-irrelevant. To test this, we collected ERPs from participants performing a modified Lexical Decision Task, in which the presence of orthographically illegal acronyms rendered meaningless illegal strings more difficult lures than normal. Confirming our hypothesis, under these conditions illegal strings elicited robust N400 repetition effects, quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those elicited by words, pseudowords, and acronyms.",
keywords = "ERPs, Lexical decision, N400, Semantic access",
author = "Sarah Laszlo and Mallory Stites and Federmeier, {Kara D}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01690965.2011.606667",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "257--274",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Won't get fooled again

T2 - An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics

AU - Laszlo, Sarah

AU - Stites, Mallory

AU - Federmeier, Kara D

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - A growing body of evidence suggests that semantic access is obligatory. Several studies have demonstrated that brain activity associated with semantic processing, measured in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), is elicited even by meaningless, orthographically illegal strings, suggesting that semantic access is not gated by lexicality. However, the downstream consequences of that activity vary by item type, exemplified by the typical finding that N400 activity is reduced by repetition for words and pronounceable nonwords but not for illegal strings. We propose that this lack of repetition effect for illegal strings is caused not by lack of contact with semantics, but by the unrefined nature of that contact under conditions in which illegal strings can be readily categorised as task-irrelevant. To test this, we collected ERPs from participants performing a modified Lexical Decision Task, in which the presence of orthographically illegal acronyms rendered meaningless illegal strings more difficult lures than normal. Confirming our hypothesis, under these conditions illegal strings elicited robust N400 repetition effects, quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those elicited by words, pseudowords, and acronyms.

AB - A growing body of evidence suggests that semantic access is obligatory. Several studies have demonstrated that brain activity associated with semantic processing, measured in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), is elicited even by meaningless, orthographically illegal strings, suggesting that semantic access is not gated by lexicality. However, the downstream consequences of that activity vary by item type, exemplified by the typical finding that N400 activity is reduced by repetition for words and pronounceable nonwords but not for illegal strings. We propose that this lack of repetition effect for illegal strings is caused not by lack of contact with semantics, but by the unrefined nature of that contact under conditions in which illegal strings can be readily categorised as task-irrelevant. To test this, we collected ERPs from participants performing a modified Lexical Decision Task, in which the presence of orthographically illegal acronyms rendered meaningless illegal strings more difficult lures than normal. Confirming our hypothesis, under these conditions illegal strings elicited robust N400 repetition effects, quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those elicited by words, pseudowords, and acronyms.

KW - ERPs

KW - Lexical decision

KW - N400

KW - Semantic access

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856845794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856845794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690965.2011.606667

DO - 10.1080/01690965.2011.606667

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856845794

VL - 27

SP - 257

EP - 274

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 2

ER -