Within- and Between-Culture Variation: Individual Differences and the Cultural Logics of Honor, Face, and Dignity Cultures

Angela K.Y. Leung, Dov Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same " type" of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the " type" of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-526
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

honor
Individuality
Violence
human being
Noise
Psychology
integrity
violence
experiment

Keywords

  • Between-culture variation
  • Culture
  • Dignity
  • Face
  • Honor
  • Individual differences
  • Within-culture variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Within- and Between-Culture Variation : Individual Differences and the Cultural Logics of Honor, Face, and Dignity Cultures. / Leung, Angela K.Y.; Cohen, Dov.

In: Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 100, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 507-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{738496db2d614e0391ffbf0d06f96605,
title = "Within- and Between-Culture Variation: Individual Differences and the Cultural Logics of Honor, Face, and Dignity Cultures",
abstract = "The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same {"} type{"} of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the {"} type{"} of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation.",
keywords = "Between-culture variation, Culture, Dignity, Face, Honor, Individual differences, Within-culture variation",
author = "Leung, {Angela K.Y.} and Dov Cohen",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0022151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "507--526",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Within- and Between-Culture Variation

T2 - Individual Differences and the Cultural Logics of Honor, Face, and Dignity Cultures

AU - Leung, Angela K.Y.

AU - Cohen, Dov

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same " type" of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the " type" of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation.

AB - The CuPS (Culture × Person × Situation) approach attempts to jointly consider culture and individual differences, without treating either as noise and without reducing one to the other. Culture is important because it helps define psychological situations and create meaningful clusters of behavior according to particular logics. Individual differences are important because individuals vary in the extent to which they endorse or reject a culture's ideals. Further, because different cultures are organized by different logics, individual differences mean something different in each. Central to these studies are concepts of honor-related violence and individual worth as being inalienable versus socially conferred. We illustrate our argument with 2 experiments involving participants from honor, face, and dignity cultures. The studies showed that the same " type" of person who was most helpful, honest, and likely to behave with integrity in one culture was the " type" of person least likely to do so in another culture. We discuss how CuPS can provide a rudimentary but integrated approach to understanding both within- and between-culture variation.

KW - Between-culture variation

KW - Culture

KW - Dignity

KW - Face

KW - Honor

KW - Individual differences

KW - Within-culture variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952083552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952083552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0022151

DO - 10.1037/a0022151

M3 - Article

C2 - 21244179

AN - SCOPUS:79952083552

VL - 100

SP - 507

EP - 526

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -