TY - JOUR
T1 - Wireless sensors in distributed detection applications
AU - Chamberland, Jean François
AU - Veeravalli, Venugopal V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Venugopal V. Veeravalli ([email protected]) received the the Ph.D. degree in 1992 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the M.S. degree in 1987 from Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and the B.Tech. degree in 1985 from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, (Silver Medal Honors), all in electrical engineering. He joined the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2000, where he is currently a professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and a research professor in the Coordinated Science Laboratory. He served as a program director for communications research at the U.S. National Science Foundation in Arlington, VA from 2003–2005. He was an assistant professor at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY from 1996 to 2000. His research interests include detection and estimation theory, information theory, wireless communications, and sensor networks. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and currently on the Board of Governors of the IEEE Information Theory Society. He was an associate editor for “Detection and Estimation” for IEEE Transactions on Information Theory from 2000–2003 and an associate editor for IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications from 1999–2000. He received the IEEE Browder J. Thompson Best Paper Award in 1996, the National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 1998, and the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 1999.
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - The success of emerging sensor network technologies rests on the ability to detect events of interest. In a setting where local sensors preprocess observations before transmitting data to a fusion center, the corresponding decision making problem is termed decentralized detection. Decentralized detection has found applications in sensor networks. Classical decentralized detection framework has limited application to modern wireless sensor networks. Reevaluating classical decentralization is an instrumental step in deriving valuable guidelines for the efficient design of sensor networks. Departure from the classical decentralized detection framework comes from the realization that wireless sensors transmit data over a common wireless spectrum. However, sensor nodes are bounded by design factors like cost, spectral bandwidth and and power requirements. A natural initial approach to the capacity-constrained problem is to overlook the specifics of these physical parameters and to constrain the sum-capacity of the multiple-access channel available to the sensors. Recent initiatives on decentralized detection consist in incorporating the effects of the wireless environment on the transmission of messages between the sensors and the fusion center. Also, researchers have started to explore new paradigms for detection over wireless sensor networks, which are based on the view that future systems are application-specific systems. Another paradigm may use local message passing, which reduce the need for spectral bandwidth and there is no designated fusion center. Another way is for the nodes to exploit a multihop communication scheme where data packets are relayed from sensor to sensor until they reach their respective destinations.
AB - The success of emerging sensor network technologies rests on the ability to detect events of interest. In a setting where local sensors preprocess observations before transmitting data to a fusion center, the corresponding decision making problem is termed decentralized detection. Decentralized detection has found applications in sensor networks. Classical decentralized detection framework has limited application to modern wireless sensor networks. Reevaluating classical decentralization is an instrumental step in deriving valuable guidelines for the efficient design of sensor networks. Departure from the classical decentralized detection framework comes from the realization that wireless sensors transmit data over a common wireless spectrum. However, sensor nodes are bounded by design factors like cost, spectral bandwidth and and power requirements. A natural initial approach to the capacity-constrained problem is to overlook the specifics of these physical parameters and to constrain the sum-capacity of the multiple-access channel available to the sensors. Recent initiatives on decentralized detection consist in incorporating the effects of the wireless environment on the transmission of messages between the sensors and the fusion center. Also, researchers have started to explore new paradigms for detection over wireless sensor networks, which are based on the view that future systems are application-specific systems. Another paradigm may use local message passing, which reduce the need for spectral bandwidth and there is no designated fusion center. Another way is for the nodes to exploit a multihop communication scheme where data packets are relayed from sensor to sensor until they reach their respective destinations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032751974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032751974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/MSP.2007.361598
DO - 10.1109/MSP.2007.361598
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032751974
SN - 1053-5888
VL - 24
SP - 16
EP - 25
JO - IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
JF - IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
IS - 3
ER -