TY - JOUR
T1 - Wire-sizing optimization with inductance consideration using transmission-line model
AU - Gao, Youxin
AU - Wong, D. F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received February 1, 1999; revised September 13, 1999. This work was supported in part by the Texas Advanced Research Program under Grant 003658288 and in part by Intel Corp. under a Grant. This paper was recommended by Associate Editor C.-K. Cheng. The authors are with the Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA. Publisher Item Identifier S 0278-0070(99)09911-X.
PY - 1999/12
Y1 - 1999/12
N2 - Because of the inaccuracy of the Elmore delay model and its inability to handle inductance, it is necessary to use a more accurate delay model in wire-sizing optimization. This paper presents continuous wire-sizing optimization by using a three pole based delay model. Our work is focused on exponential wire shape f(x) = ae-bx, i.e., we determine a and b such that either delay or area is minimized. Fringing capacitance and inductance, which have been neglected in previous work on wire sizing, are taken into consideration in the delay model. Expressions involved in calculating all three poles are derived with the help of the Picard-Carson method. Since these expressions are all analytical, the delay calculation is very efficient. In our experiments, the delay model is found to be far more accurate than the Elmore delay model. We also observe that in determining the optimal shape that minimizes delay, the Elmore delay model performs as well as our delay model. However, in determining the optimal shape that minimizes area subject to a delay bound, the Elmore delay model performs much worse than our delay model.
AB - Because of the inaccuracy of the Elmore delay model and its inability to handle inductance, it is necessary to use a more accurate delay model in wire-sizing optimization. This paper presents continuous wire-sizing optimization by using a three pole based delay model. Our work is focused on exponential wire shape f(x) = ae-bx, i.e., we determine a and b such that either delay or area is minimized. Fringing capacitance and inductance, which have been neglected in previous work on wire sizing, are taken into consideration in the delay model. Expressions involved in calculating all three poles are derived with the help of the Picard-Carson method. Since these expressions are all analytical, the delay calculation is very efficient. In our experiments, the delay model is found to be far more accurate than the Elmore delay model. We also observe that in determining the optimal shape that minimizes delay, the Elmore delay model performs as well as our delay model. However, in determining the optimal shape that minimizes area subject to a delay bound, the Elmore delay model performs much worse than our delay model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033328239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033328239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/43.811325
DO - 10.1109/43.811325
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033328239
SN - 0278-0070
VL - 18
SP - 1759
EP - 1767
JO - IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
IS - 12
ER -