Winter legume-rice rotations can reduce nitrogen pollution and carbon footprint while maintaining net ecosystem economic benefits

Siyuan Cai, Cameron M Pittelkow, Xu Zhao, Shenqiang Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Achieving reductions in nitrogen (N) losses and carbon (C) emissions without enduring a yield penalty is an environmental and economic challenge in sustainable rice production. The use of legumes as a winter crop in rice rotations may provide environmental benefits by reducing synthetic N inputs, yet few studies have integrated long-term field measurements of cropping system N and C dynamics with life cycle assessment (LCA) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) to determine whether legumes can improve environmental performance while minimizing tradeoffs related to yields and economic returns. We evaluated four contrasting rice cropping rotations (Rice-wheat (R-W); rice-rape (R-Ra); rice-fava bean (R-F); and, rice-milk vetch (R-M)) over six years to determine N input and output balances, methane (CH 4 ) emissions, and soil C changes. These field observations were then incorporated into LCA and NEEB to estimate C footprint, economic and environmental benefits. Results showed that R-F and R-M maintained rice yield but reduced annual synthetic N inputs by 50–63% compared with the conventional R-W and R-Ra rotations, leading to consistent reductions in reactive N losses (ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization: 39–48%; N runoff: 66–82%; N leaching: 14–34%; and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions: 40–64%). The estimated C footprint was 37–50% lower in R-F and R-M than R-W and R-Ra, largely owing to reduced fertilizer use which decreased direct soil N 2 O emissions as well as indirect emissions relating to reactive N losses. In contrast to N losses, there were no significant differences in CH 4 emissions or soil C changes among rotations. When changes in N pollution and C footprint were accounted for in the economic assessment, R-F resulted in NEEB values similar to R-W, while substituting milk vetch as a winter crop reduced NEEB by 6–37%. In the first two study years before grain legume yields declined, NEEB for R-F was 38% greater than R-W, highlighting the potential for simultaneous environmental and economic benefits. This study demonstrated the potential of mixed winter grain/forage legumes-rice crop rotations to consistently reduce N pollution and C footprint while maintaining NEEB based on economic and environmental benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-300
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume195
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2018

Fingerprint

Carbon footprint
carbon footprint
Ecosystems
Pollution
rice
Nitrogen
pollution
Economics
ecosystem
nitrogen
winter
economics
Crops
footprint
wheat
milk
Soils
Economic benefits
Legumes
Ecosystem

Keywords

  • C footprint
  • Life cycle analysis
  • N O emission
  • N pollution
  • Net environmental economic benefits
  • Rice-legume rotation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Winter legume-rice rotations can reduce nitrogen pollution and carbon footprint while maintaining net ecosystem economic benefits. / Cai, Siyuan; Pittelkow, Cameron M; Zhao, Xu; Wang, Shenqiang.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 195, 10.09.2018, p. 289-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{215f1bdaa4844842b8c1c1aedfbefde4,
title = "Winter legume-rice rotations can reduce nitrogen pollution and carbon footprint while maintaining net ecosystem economic benefits",
abstract = "Achieving reductions in nitrogen (N) losses and carbon (C) emissions without enduring a yield penalty is an environmental and economic challenge in sustainable rice production. The use of legumes as a winter crop in rice rotations may provide environmental benefits by reducing synthetic N inputs, yet few studies have integrated long-term field measurements of cropping system N and C dynamics with life cycle assessment (LCA) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) to determine whether legumes can improve environmental performance while minimizing tradeoffs related to yields and economic returns. We evaluated four contrasting rice cropping rotations (Rice-wheat (R-W); rice-rape (R-Ra); rice-fava bean (R-F); and, rice-milk vetch (R-M)) over six years to determine N input and output balances, methane (CH 4 ) emissions, and soil C changes. These field observations were then incorporated into LCA and NEEB to estimate C footprint, economic and environmental benefits. Results showed that R-F and R-M maintained rice yield but reduced annual synthetic N inputs by 50–63{\%} compared with the conventional R-W and R-Ra rotations, leading to consistent reductions in reactive N losses (ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization: 39–48{\%}; N runoff: 66–82{\%}; N leaching: 14–34{\%}; and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions: 40–64{\%}). The estimated C footprint was 37–50{\%} lower in R-F and R-M than R-W and R-Ra, largely owing to reduced fertilizer use which decreased direct soil N 2 O emissions as well as indirect emissions relating to reactive N losses. In contrast to N losses, there were no significant differences in CH 4 emissions or soil C changes among rotations. When changes in N pollution and C footprint were accounted for in the economic assessment, R-F resulted in NEEB values similar to R-W, while substituting milk vetch as a winter crop reduced NEEB by 6–37{\%}. In the first two study years before grain legume yields declined, NEEB for R-F was 38{\%} greater than R-W, highlighting the potential for simultaneous environmental and economic benefits. This study demonstrated the potential of mixed winter grain/forage legumes-rice crop rotations to consistently reduce N pollution and C footprint while maintaining NEEB based on economic and environmental benefits.",
keywords = "C footprint, Life cycle analysis, N O emission, N pollution, Net environmental economic benefits, Rice-legume rotation",
author = "Siyuan Cai and Pittelkow, {Cameron M} and Xu Zhao and Shenqiang Wang",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "195",
pages = "289--300",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Winter legume-rice rotations can reduce nitrogen pollution and carbon footprint while maintaining net ecosystem economic benefits

AU - Cai, Siyuan

AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M

AU - Zhao, Xu

AU - Wang, Shenqiang

PY - 2018/9/10

Y1 - 2018/9/10

N2 - Achieving reductions in nitrogen (N) losses and carbon (C) emissions without enduring a yield penalty is an environmental and economic challenge in sustainable rice production. The use of legumes as a winter crop in rice rotations may provide environmental benefits by reducing synthetic N inputs, yet few studies have integrated long-term field measurements of cropping system N and C dynamics with life cycle assessment (LCA) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) to determine whether legumes can improve environmental performance while minimizing tradeoffs related to yields and economic returns. We evaluated four contrasting rice cropping rotations (Rice-wheat (R-W); rice-rape (R-Ra); rice-fava bean (R-F); and, rice-milk vetch (R-M)) over six years to determine N input and output balances, methane (CH 4 ) emissions, and soil C changes. These field observations were then incorporated into LCA and NEEB to estimate C footprint, economic and environmental benefits. Results showed that R-F and R-M maintained rice yield but reduced annual synthetic N inputs by 50–63% compared with the conventional R-W and R-Ra rotations, leading to consistent reductions in reactive N losses (ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization: 39–48%; N runoff: 66–82%; N leaching: 14–34%; and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions: 40–64%). The estimated C footprint was 37–50% lower in R-F and R-M than R-W and R-Ra, largely owing to reduced fertilizer use which decreased direct soil N 2 O emissions as well as indirect emissions relating to reactive N losses. In contrast to N losses, there were no significant differences in CH 4 emissions or soil C changes among rotations. When changes in N pollution and C footprint were accounted for in the economic assessment, R-F resulted in NEEB values similar to R-W, while substituting milk vetch as a winter crop reduced NEEB by 6–37%. In the first two study years before grain legume yields declined, NEEB for R-F was 38% greater than R-W, highlighting the potential for simultaneous environmental and economic benefits. This study demonstrated the potential of mixed winter grain/forage legumes-rice crop rotations to consistently reduce N pollution and C footprint while maintaining NEEB based on economic and environmental benefits.

AB - Achieving reductions in nitrogen (N) losses and carbon (C) emissions without enduring a yield penalty is an environmental and economic challenge in sustainable rice production. The use of legumes as a winter crop in rice rotations may provide environmental benefits by reducing synthetic N inputs, yet few studies have integrated long-term field measurements of cropping system N and C dynamics with life cycle assessment (LCA) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) to determine whether legumes can improve environmental performance while minimizing tradeoffs related to yields and economic returns. We evaluated four contrasting rice cropping rotations (Rice-wheat (R-W); rice-rape (R-Ra); rice-fava bean (R-F); and, rice-milk vetch (R-M)) over six years to determine N input and output balances, methane (CH 4 ) emissions, and soil C changes. These field observations were then incorporated into LCA and NEEB to estimate C footprint, economic and environmental benefits. Results showed that R-F and R-M maintained rice yield but reduced annual synthetic N inputs by 50–63% compared with the conventional R-W and R-Ra rotations, leading to consistent reductions in reactive N losses (ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization: 39–48%; N runoff: 66–82%; N leaching: 14–34%; and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions: 40–64%). The estimated C footprint was 37–50% lower in R-F and R-M than R-W and R-Ra, largely owing to reduced fertilizer use which decreased direct soil N 2 O emissions as well as indirect emissions relating to reactive N losses. In contrast to N losses, there were no significant differences in CH 4 emissions or soil C changes among rotations. When changes in N pollution and C footprint were accounted for in the economic assessment, R-F resulted in NEEB values similar to R-W, while substituting milk vetch as a winter crop reduced NEEB by 6–37%. In the first two study years before grain legume yields declined, NEEB for R-F was 38% greater than R-W, highlighting the potential for simultaneous environmental and economic benefits. This study demonstrated the potential of mixed winter grain/forage legumes-rice crop rotations to consistently reduce N pollution and C footprint while maintaining NEEB based on economic and environmental benefits.

KW - C footprint

KW - Life cycle analysis

KW - N O emission

KW - N pollution

KW - Net environmental economic benefits

KW - Rice-legume rotation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049304670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049304670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.115

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.115

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049304670

VL - 195

SP - 289

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -