Why metrics matter: Evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Melissa B.L. Birch, Benjamin M. Gramig, William R. Moomaw, Otto C. Doering, Carson J. Reeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Despite major efforts, the reduction of reactive nitrogen (Nr) using traditional metrics and policy tools for the Chesapeake Bay has slowed in recent years. In this article, we apply the concept of the Nitrogen Cascade to the chemically dynamic nature and multiple sources of Nr to examine the temporal and spatial movement of different forms of Nr through multiple ecosystems and media. We also demonstrate the benefit of using more than the traditional mass fluxes to set criteria for action. The use of multiple metrics provides additional information about where the most effective intervention point might be. Utilizing damage costs or mortality metrics demonstrates that even though the mass fluxes to the atmosphere are lower than direct releases to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, total damage costs to all ecosystems and health are higher because of the cascade of Nr and the associated damages, and because they exact a higher human health cost. Abatement costs for reducing Nr releases into the air are also lower. These findings have major implications for the use of multiple metrics and the additional benefits of expanding the scope of concern beyond the Bay itself and support improved coordination between the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts while restoring the Chesapeake Bay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-174
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Why metrics matter: Evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this