Why Literary Periods Mattered: Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

In the mid-nineteenth century, the study of English literature began to be divided into courses that surveyed discrete "periods." Since that time, scholars' definitions of literature and their rationales for teaching it have changed radically. But the periodized structure of the curriculum has remained oddly unshaken, as if the exercise of contrasting one literary period with another has an importance that transcends the content of any individual course.

Why Literary Periods Mattered explains how historical contrast became central to literary study, and why it remained institutionally central in spite of critical controversy about literature itself. Organizing literary history around contrast rather than causal continuity helped literature departments separate themselves from departments of history. But critics' long reliance on a rhetoric of contrasted movements and fateful turns has produced important blind spots in the discipline. In the twenty-first century, Underwood argues, literary study may need digital technology in particular to develop new methods of reasoning about gradual, continuous change.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Place of PublicationPalo Alto, CA
PublisherStanford University Press
Number of pages216
ISBN (Electronic)9780804788441
ISBN (Print)9780804784467, 9780804795265
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

English Studies
Historical Periods
Prestige
Literary Studies
Curriculum
Organizing
Exercise
Rhetoric
History
Reliance
English Literature
Continuity
Teaching
Digital Technology
Causal
Literary History

Cite this

Why Literary Periods Mattered : Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies. / Underwood, William E.

Palo Alto, CA : Stanford University Press, 2013. 216 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{a86b56f0fe214b0bb9e4f96a8c7f64ed,
title = "Why Literary Periods Mattered: Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies",
abstract = "In the mid-nineteenth century, the study of English literature began to be divided into courses that surveyed discrete {"}periods.{"} Since that time, scholars' definitions of literature and their rationales for teaching it have changed radically. But the periodized structure of the curriculum has remained oddly unshaken, as if the exercise of contrasting one literary period with another has an importance that transcends the content of any individual course.Why Literary Periods Mattered explains how historical contrast became central to literary study, and why it remained institutionally central in spite of critical controversy about literature itself. Organizing literary history around contrast rather than causal continuity helped literature departments separate themselves from departments of history. But critics' long reliance on a rhetoric of contrasted movements and fateful turns has produced important blind spots in the discipline. In the twenty-first century, Underwood argues, literary study may need digital technology in particular to develop new methods of reasoning about gradual, continuous change.",
author = "Underwood, {William E}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780804784467",
publisher = "Stanford University Press",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Why Literary Periods Mattered

T2 - Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies

AU - Underwood, William E

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the mid-nineteenth century, the study of English literature began to be divided into courses that surveyed discrete "periods." Since that time, scholars' definitions of literature and their rationales for teaching it have changed radically. But the periodized structure of the curriculum has remained oddly unshaken, as if the exercise of contrasting one literary period with another has an importance that transcends the content of any individual course.Why Literary Periods Mattered explains how historical contrast became central to literary study, and why it remained institutionally central in spite of critical controversy about literature itself. Organizing literary history around contrast rather than causal continuity helped literature departments separate themselves from departments of history. But critics' long reliance on a rhetoric of contrasted movements and fateful turns has produced important blind spots in the discipline. In the twenty-first century, Underwood argues, literary study may need digital technology in particular to develop new methods of reasoning about gradual, continuous change.

AB - In the mid-nineteenth century, the study of English literature began to be divided into courses that surveyed discrete "periods." Since that time, scholars' definitions of literature and their rationales for teaching it have changed radically. But the periodized structure of the curriculum has remained oddly unshaken, as if the exercise of contrasting one literary period with another has an importance that transcends the content of any individual course.Why Literary Periods Mattered explains how historical contrast became central to literary study, and why it remained institutionally central in spite of critical controversy about literature itself. Organizing literary history around contrast rather than causal continuity helped literature departments separate themselves from departments of history. But critics' long reliance on a rhetoric of contrasted movements and fateful turns has produced important blind spots in the discipline. In the twenty-first century, Underwood argues, literary study may need digital technology in particular to develop new methods of reasoning about gradual, continuous change.

M3 - Book

SN - 9780804784467

SN - 9780804795265

BT - Why Literary Periods Mattered

PB - Stanford University Press

CY - Palo Alto, CA

ER -