TY - JOUR
T1 - Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production
AU - Jacobs, Cassandra L.
AU - Yiu, Loretta K.
AU - Watson, Duane G.
AU - Dell, Gary S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author is supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship . This project was funded in part by NIH DC-000191 and R01 DC008774 as well as the James S. McDonnell Foundation . We would like to thank our research assistants Jace McNett, Kathy Kastanes, Steven Anderson, and Xiaomeng Li for their help collecting and processing the data, as well as Matt Goldrick for his comments on this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc..
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Acoustic reduction for repeated words could be the result of articulation and motor practice (Lam & Watson, 2014), facilitated production (Gahl, Yao, & Johnson, 2012; Kahn & Arnold, 2015), or audience design and shared common ground (Galati & Brennan, 2010). We sought to narrow down what kind of facilitation leads to repetition reduction. Repetition could, in principle, facilitate production on a conceptual, lexical, phonological, articulatory, or acoustic level (Kahn & Arnold, 2015). We compared the durations of the second utterance of a target word when the initial production was aloud or silent. The silent presentation either involved unmouthed or mouthed inner speech. Overt production, unmouthed and mouthed inner speech all led to reduction in target word onsets, but target word durations were only shortened when a word was initially said aloud. In an additional experiment, we found that prior naming of a homophone of the target word also led to duration reduction. The results suggest that repetition reduction occurs when there is a recently experienced auditory memory of the item. We propose that duration may be controlled in part by auditory feedback during production, the use of which can be primed by recent auditory experience.
AB - Acoustic reduction for repeated words could be the result of articulation and motor practice (Lam & Watson, 2014), facilitated production (Gahl, Yao, & Johnson, 2012; Kahn & Arnold, 2015), or audience design and shared common ground (Galati & Brennan, 2010). We sought to narrow down what kind of facilitation leads to repetition reduction. Repetition could, in principle, facilitate production on a conceptual, lexical, phonological, articulatory, or acoustic level (Kahn & Arnold, 2015). We compared the durations of the second utterance of a target word when the initial production was aloud or silent. The silent presentation either involved unmouthed or mouthed inner speech. Overt production, unmouthed and mouthed inner speech all led to reduction in target word onsets, but target word durations were only shortened when a word was initially said aloud. In an additional experiment, we found that prior naming of a homophone of the target word also led to duration reduction. The results suggest that repetition reduction occurs when there is a recently experienced auditory memory of the item. We propose that duration may be controlled in part by auditory feedback during production, the use of which can be primed by recent auditory experience.
KW - Duration
KW - Homophone production
KW - Inner speech
KW - Repetition priming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934873068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934873068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84934873068
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 84
SP - 37
EP - 48
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
ER -