Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


The concept of responsibility lies at the heart of theories of democratic accountability. This article represents the first attempt to explicitly model attributions of presidential versus congressional responsibility for the economy. The article investigates the extent to which contextual and individual-level factors influence citizens' attributions of responsibility for the economy and how, in turn, such judgments shape their political evaluations. Employing a multinomial probit model of attributional choice, I find that responsibility judgments are shaped to varying degrees by economic ideology, perceptions of institutional context, and partisanship, although the effects of partisanship are not uniform across political parties. The results demonstrate that responsibility attributions are politically consequential and moderate the effects of economic perceptions on presidential and congressional approval. Finally, the results suggest that the effects of responsibility attributions in the sanctioning process are not invariant across the target of institutional evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)698-713
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this