Abstract
In this note, we provide direct evidence of cheating in online assessments of political knowledge. We combine survey responses with web tracking data of a German and a US online panel to assess whether people turn to external sources for answers. We observe item-level prevalence rates of cheating that range from 0 to 12 percent depending on question type and difficulty, and find that 23 percent of respondents engage in cheating at least once across waves. In the US panel, which employed a commitment pledge, we observe cheating behavior among less than 1 percent of respondents. We find robust respondent- and item-level characteristics associated with cheating. However, item-level instances of cheating are rare events; as such, they are difficult to predict and correct for without tracking data. Even so, our analyses comparing naive and cheating-corrected measures of political knowledge provide evidence that cheating does not substantially distort inferences.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 390-398 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Political Science Research and Methods |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2024 |
Keywords
- digital trace data
- measurement
- Measurement
- political knowledge
- survey design
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations