Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions

Peter Newton, Daniel C. Miller, Mugabi Augustine Ateenyi Byenkya, Arun Agrawal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The relationship between forests and people is of substantial interest to peoples and agencies that govern and use them, private sector actors that seek to manage and profit from them, NGOs who support and implement conservation and development projects, and researchers who study these relationships and others. The term 'forest-dependent people' is widely used to describe human populations that gain some form of benefits from forests. But despite its long history and widespread use, there are substantial divergences in who the term refers to, what each of its constituent words mean, and how many forest-dependent people there are globally. This paper identifies the range of existing uses and definitions of the term 'forest-dependent people', and summarizes them in a systematic taxonomy. Our taxonomy exposes the dimensions that characterize the relationships between people and forests, and leads to two conclusions: First, an absolute, universally accepted definition of the term is untenable. Rather, users of the term 'forest-dependent people' need to comprehensively define their population of interest with reference to the context and purpose of their forest- and people-related objectives. The framework and language of our taxonomy aims to aid such efforts. Second, conservation and development program funders, designers, and implementers must reconsider whether forest dependence is an appropriate target for policy objectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-395
Number of pages8
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume57
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2016

Fingerprint

livelihood
taxonomy
aid
decision making
land use
conservation
development projects
private sector
conservation programs
development project
human population
nongovernmental organization
divergence
profits and margins
non-governmental organization
profit
researchers
history
language

Keywords

  • Development
  • Environmental change
  • Forests
  • Livelihoods
  • Policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. / Newton, Peter; Miller, Daniel C.; Byenkya, Mugabi Augustine Ateenyi; Agrawal, Arun.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 57, 30.11.2016, p. 388-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newton, Peter ; Miller, Daniel C. ; Byenkya, Mugabi Augustine Ateenyi ; Agrawal, Arun. / Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions. In: Land Use Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 57. pp. 388-395.
@article{9dbb4fb1896d4e40acb0cbc99706425e,
title = "Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions",
abstract = "The relationship between forests and people is of substantial interest to peoples and agencies that govern and use them, private sector actors that seek to manage and profit from them, NGOs who support and implement conservation and development projects, and researchers who study these relationships and others. The term 'forest-dependent people' is widely used to describe human populations that gain some form of benefits from forests. But despite its long history and widespread use, there are substantial divergences in who the term refers to, what each of its constituent words mean, and how many forest-dependent people there are globally. This paper identifies the range of existing uses and definitions of the term 'forest-dependent people', and summarizes them in a systematic taxonomy. Our taxonomy exposes the dimensions that characterize the relationships between people and forests, and leads to two conclusions: First, an absolute, universally accepted definition of the term is untenable. Rather, users of the term 'forest-dependent people' need to comprehensively define their population of interest with reference to the context and purpose of their forest- and people-related objectives. The framework and language of our taxonomy aims to aid such efforts. Second, conservation and development program funders, designers, and implementers must reconsider whether forest dependence is an appropriate target for policy objectives.",
keywords = "Development, Environmental change, Forests, Livelihoods, Policy",
author = "Peter Newton and Miller, {Daniel C.} and Byenkya, {Mugabi Augustine Ateenyi} and Arun Agrawal",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "388--395",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who are forest-dependent people? A taxonomy to aid livelihood and land use decision-making in forested regions

AU - Newton, Peter

AU - Miller, Daniel C.

AU - Byenkya, Mugabi Augustine Ateenyi

AU - Agrawal, Arun

PY - 2016/11/30

Y1 - 2016/11/30

N2 - The relationship between forests and people is of substantial interest to peoples and agencies that govern and use them, private sector actors that seek to manage and profit from them, NGOs who support and implement conservation and development projects, and researchers who study these relationships and others. The term 'forest-dependent people' is widely used to describe human populations that gain some form of benefits from forests. But despite its long history and widespread use, there are substantial divergences in who the term refers to, what each of its constituent words mean, and how many forest-dependent people there are globally. This paper identifies the range of existing uses and definitions of the term 'forest-dependent people', and summarizes them in a systematic taxonomy. Our taxonomy exposes the dimensions that characterize the relationships between people and forests, and leads to two conclusions: First, an absolute, universally accepted definition of the term is untenable. Rather, users of the term 'forest-dependent people' need to comprehensively define their population of interest with reference to the context and purpose of their forest- and people-related objectives. The framework and language of our taxonomy aims to aid such efforts. Second, conservation and development program funders, designers, and implementers must reconsider whether forest dependence is an appropriate target for policy objectives.

AB - The relationship between forests and people is of substantial interest to peoples and agencies that govern and use them, private sector actors that seek to manage and profit from them, NGOs who support and implement conservation and development projects, and researchers who study these relationships and others. The term 'forest-dependent people' is widely used to describe human populations that gain some form of benefits from forests. But despite its long history and widespread use, there are substantial divergences in who the term refers to, what each of its constituent words mean, and how many forest-dependent people there are globally. This paper identifies the range of existing uses and definitions of the term 'forest-dependent people', and summarizes them in a systematic taxonomy. Our taxonomy exposes the dimensions that characterize the relationships between people and forests, and leads to two conclusions: First, an absolute, universally accepted definition of the term is untenable. Rather, users of the term 'forest-dependent people' need to comprehensively define their population of interest with reference to the context and purpose of their forest- and people-related objectives. The framework and language of our taxonomy aims to aid such efforts. Second, conservation and development program funders, designers, and implementers must reconsider whether forest dependence is an appropriate target for policy objectives.

KW - Development

KW - Environmental change

KW - Forests

KW - Livelihoods

KW - Policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975525677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975525677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.032

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975525677

VL - 57

SP - 388

EP - 395

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -