Who am I in relation to them? Gay, lesbian, and queer people leave the city to attend rural family weddings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nine gay, lesbian, and queer adults who were raised in rural areas but now live in the city returned to their families and communities of origin to artend family weddings. The shift from urban to rural, nonfamily to family, everyday to ritual, was a shift by which they renegotiated their sense of self as different from their families and communities of origin. What it meant to be gay, lesbian, or queer (GLQ) depended upon specific interaction contexts. The negotiation of being different as GLQ occurred within dialectics of visibility/invisibility, closeness/distance, and comfort/discomfort during weddings. Results presented here emerged as significant within a larger study of heterosexism and family ritual. Data were collected in focus group interviews and analyzed inductively using a combination of family discourse and grounded theory methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-348
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Family Issues
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2002

Fingerprint

wedding
religious behavior
discourse theory
dialectics
grounded theory
community
rural area
interaction
interview
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Who am I in relation to them? Gay, lesbian, and queer people leave the city to attend rural family weddings. / Oswald, Ramona Faith.

In: Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.04.2002, p. 323-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad9d541a9ec8498990875ffc4f079575,
title = "Who am I in relation to them? Gay, lesbian, and queer people leave the city to attend rural family weddings",
abstract = "Nine gay, lesbian, and queer adults who were raised in rural areas but now live in the city returned to their families and communities of origin to artend family weddings. The shift from urban to rural, nonfamily to family, everyday to ritual, was a shift by which they renegotiated their sense of self as different from their families and communities of origin. What it meant to be gay, lesbian, or queer (GLQ) depended upon specific interaction contexts. The negotiation of being different as GLQ occurred within dialectics of visibility/invisibility, closeness/distance, and comfort/discomfort during weddings. Results presented here emerged as significant within a larger study of heterosexism and family ritual. Data were collected in focus group interviews and analyzed inductively using a combination of family discourse and grounded theory methods.",
author = "Oswald, {Ramona Faith}",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0192513X02023003001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "323--348",
journal = "Journal of Family Issues",
issn = "0192-513X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who am I in relation to them? Gay, lesbian, and queer people leave the city to attend rural family weddings

AU - Oswald, Ramona Faith

PY - 2002/4/1

Y1 - 2002/4/1

N2 - Nine gay, lesbian, and queer adults who were raised in rural areas but now live in the city returned to their families and communities of origin to artend family weddings. The shift from urban to rural, nonfamily to family, everyday to ritual, was a shift by which they renegotiated their sense of self as different from their families and communities of origin. What it meant to be gay, lesbian, or queer (GLQ) depended upon specific interaction contexts. The negotiation of being different as GLQ occurred within dialectics of visibility/invisibility, closeness/distance, and comfort/discomfort during weddings. Results presented here emerged as significant within a larger study of heterosexism and family ritual. Data were collected in focus group interviews and analyzed inductively using a combination of family discourse and grounded theory methods.

AB - Nine gay, lesbian, and queer adults who were raised in rural areas but now live in the city returned to their families and communities of origin to artend family weddings. The shift from urban to rural, nonfamily to family, everyday to ritual, was a shift by which they renegotiated their sense of self as different from their families and communities of origin. What it meant to be gay, lesbian, or queer (GLQ) depended upon specific interaction contexts. The negotiation of being different as GLQ occurred within dialectics of visibility/invisibility, closeness/distance, and comfort/discomfort during weddings. Results presented here emerged as significant within a larger study of heterosexism and family ritual. Data were collected in focus group interviews and analyzed inductively using a combination of family discourse and grounded theory methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036248723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036248723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192513X02023003001

DO - 10.1177/0192513X02023003001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036248723

VL - 23

SP - 323

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Family Issues

JF - Journal of Family Issues

SN - 0192-513X

IS - 3

ER -