"When you call me that, smile!" how norms for politeness, interaction styles, and aggression work together in Southern culture

Dov Cohen, Joseph Vandello, Sylvia Puente, Adrian Rantilla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Norms for politeness may actually promote violence in the U.S. South. Whereas northerners may have behavioral rituals in which they give and receive small doses of hostility to regulate conflict, southerners seem not to. In two laboratory experiments, southerners were less clear than northerners in both sending and receiving signs of hostility. In Study 1, southerners initially showed little reaction to an annoying confederate only to end with bursts of anger far mo re sudden and more severe than northerners ever showed. In Study 2, as subjects watched objectively dangerous situations unfold, southerners were less sensitive to cues of hostility than were northerners. And in Study 3, consistent with southern politeness norms inhibiting effective conflict resolution, it was shown that friendly, helpful cities had different patterns of argument-related violence in the North and in the South. Results suggest a cycle in which norms for politeness and for violence can reinforce each other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-275
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999

Fingerprint

Hostility
Aggression
Violence
Ceremonial Behavior
Negotiating
Anger
Cues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

"When you call me that, smile!" how norms for politeness, interaction styles, and aggression work together in Southern culture. / Cohen, Dov; Vandello, Joseph; Puente, Sylvia; Rantilla, Adrian.

In: Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 3, 09.1999, p. 257-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10c2970d0b9740e193ad4b8041cf86e7,
title = "{"}When you call me that, smile!{"} how norms for politeness, interaction styles, and aggression work together in Southern culture",
abstract = "Norms for politeness may actually promote violence in the U.S. South. Whereas northerners may have behavioral rituals in which they give and receive small doses of hostility to regulate conflict, southerners seem not to. In two laboratory experiments, southerners were less clear than northerners in both sending and receiving signs of hostility. In Study 1, southerners initially showed little reaction to an annoying confederate only to end with bursts of anger far mo re sudden and more severe than northerners ever showed. In Study 2, as subjects watched objectively dangerous situations unfold, southerners were less sensitive to cues of hostility than were northerners. And in Study 3, consistent with southern politeness norms inhibiting effective conflict resolution, it was shown that friendly, helpful cities had different patterns of argument-related violence in the North and in the South. Results suggest a cycle in which norms for politeness and for violence can reinforce each other.",
author = "Dov Cohen and Joseph Vandello and Sylvia Puente and Adrian Rantilla",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2307/2695863",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "257--275",
journal = "Social Psychology Quarterly",
issn = "0190-2725",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "When you call me that, smile!" how norms for politeness, interaction styles, and aggression work together in Southern culture

AU - Cohen, Dov

AU - Vandello, Joseph

AU - Puente, Sylvia

AU - Rantilla, Adrian

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - Norms for politeness may actually promote violence in the U.S. South. Whereas northerners may have behavioral rituals in which they give and receive small doses of hostility to regulate conflict, southerners seem not to. In two laboratory experiments, southerners were less clear than northerners in both sending and receiving signs of hostility. In Study 1, southerners initially showed little reaction to an annoying confederate only to end with bursts of anger far mo re sudden and more severe than northerners ever showed. In Study 2, as subjects watched objectively dangerous situations unfold, southerners were less sensitive to cues of hostility than were northerners. And in Study 3, consistent with southern politeness norms inhibiting effective conflict resolution, it was shown that friendly, helpful cities had different patterns of argument-related violence in the North and in the South. Results suggest a cycle in which norms for politeness and for violence can reinforce each other.

AB - Norms for politeness may actually promote violence in the U.S. South. Whereas northerners may have behavioral rituals in which they give and receive small doses of hostility to regulate conflict, southerners seem not to. In two laboratory experiments, southerners were less clear than northerners in both sending and receiving signs of hostility. In Study 1, southerners initially showed little reaction to an annoying confederate only to end with bursts of anger far mo re sudden and more severe than northerners ever showed. In Study 2, as subjects watched objectively dangerous situations unfold, southerners were less sensitive to cues of hostility than were northerners. And in Study 3, consistent with southern politeness norms inhibiting effective conflict resolution, it was shown that friendly, helpful cities had different patterns of argument-related violence in the North and in the South. Results suggest a cycle in which norms for politeness and for violence can reinforce each other.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033181422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033181422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2695863

DO - 10.2307/2695863

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033181422

VL - 62

SP - 257

EP - 275

JO - Social Psychology Quarterly

JF - Social Psychology Quarterly

SN - 0190-2725

IS - 3

ER -