Abstract
When people are choosing among different options, context seems to play a vital role. For instance, adding a third option can increase the probability of choosing a similar dominating option. This attraction effect is one of the most widely studied phenomena in decision-making research. Its prevalence, however, has been challenged recently by the tainting hypothesis, according to which the inferior option contaminates the attribute space in which it is located, leading to a repulsion effect. In an attempt to test the tainting hypothesis and explore the conditions under which dominated options make dominating options look bad, we conducted four preregistered perceptual decision-making studies with a total of 301 participants. We identified two factors influencing individuals’ behavior: stimulus display and stimulus design. Our results contribute to a growing body of literature showing how presentation format influences behavior in preferential and perceptual decision-making tasks.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1309-1320 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Psychological Science |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- attraction effect
- context effects
- decision making
- open data
- open materials
- preregistered
- repulsion effect
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When the Good Looks Bad: An Experimental Exploration of the Repulsion Effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS