When the clock starts ticking

Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term change

Jorge Lemus, Guillermo Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As a consequence of the patent term harmonization introduced by TRIPS, the term of U.S. patents became contingent on how quickly the patents are granted. We find that patent applicants strategically responded to this change in incentives. In the pharmaceutical industry, narrower patents with less detailed descriptions allowed applicants to reduce the approval time by 10.8% (170 days). Also consistent with a ticking clock, we find a reduction in the use of continuations across all industries. Our results suggest that the patent term change created long-lasting efficiencies in the patent office.
Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalResearch Policy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 21 2018

Fingerprint

Clocks
Drug products
Industry
Strategic response
Patents

Keywords

  • TRIPS
  • patents
  • length
  • breadth
  • disclosure
  • continuations

Cite this

When the clock starts ticking : Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term change. / Lemus, Jorge; Marshall, Guillermo.

In: Research Policy, 21.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f3a74bd4b2a4d74b7fd3b6fb7a31133,
title = "When the clock starts ticking: Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term change",
abstract = "As a consequence of the patent term harmonization introduced by TRIPS, the term of U.S. patents became contingent on how quickly the patents are granted. We find that patent applicants strategically responded to this change in incentives. In the pharmaceutical industry, narrower patents with less detailed descriptions allowed applicants to reduce the approval time by 10.8{\%} (170 days). Also consistent with a ticking clock, we find a reduction in the use of continuations across all industries. Our results suggest that the patent term change created long-lasting efficiencies in the patent office.",
keywords = "TRIPS, patents, length, breadth, disclosure, continuations",
author = "Jorge Lemus and Guillermo Marshall",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the clock starts ticking

T2 - Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term change

AU - Lemus, Jorge

AU - Marshall, Guillermo

PY - 2018/2/21

Y1 - 2018/2/21

N2 - As a consequence of the patent term harmonization introduced by TRIPS, the term of U.S. patents became contingent on how quickly the patents are granted. We find that patent applicants strategically responded to this change in incentives. In the pharmaceutical industry, narrower patents with less detailed descriptions allowed applicants to reduce the approval time by 10.8% (170 days). Also consistent with a ticking clock, we find a reduction in the use of continuations across all industries. Our results suggest that the patent term change created long-lasting efficiencies in the patent office.

AB - As a consequence of the patent term harmonization introduced by TRIPS, the term of U.S. patents became contingent on how quickly the patents are granted. We find that patent applicants strategically responded to this change in incentives. In the pharmaceutical industry, narrower patents with less detailed descriptions allowed applicants to reduce the approval time by 10.8% (170 days). Also consistent with a ticking clock, we find a reduction in the use of continuations across all industries. Our results suggest that the patent term change created long-lasting efficiencies in the patent office.

KW - TRIPS

KW - patents

KW - length

KW - breadth

KW - disclosure

KW - continuations

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.008

M3 - Article

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

ER -