TY - JOUR
T1 - When one cannot bypass the byproducts
T2 - Plastic packaging waste embedded in production and export
AU - Gao, Xiang
AU - Dall'erba, Sandy
AU - Ellison, Brenna
AU - Avelino, Andre F.T.
AU - Yang, Cuihong
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper has been presented at the 2020 North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International and other research seminars. We thank all the participants for their feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the International Society for Industrial Ecology.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - While packaging is praised for reducing waste of perishable food products, packaging waste is a growing concern. Its least recyclable type, plastics waste, is increasingly polluting the marine environment and many developing countries are now refusing to take the waste from developed countries. Before responsibility can be established, one has to identify the key producers and consumers. This paper adjusts the packaging waste satellite account in EXIOBASE 3 by combining the official waste data published by the World Bank. Based on input–output methods, we find that the world's top suppliers of plastic packaging waste are the United States, China, and Brazil. Food and beverage products constitute the bulk of the problem. Yet, 21% of these countries’ plastic packaging waste is induced export. At the global level, it is 25.8%. About 76.0% of export-induced plastic packaging waste corresponds to packaging of the exported goods that will ultimately be disposed of in the destination country; while the others correspond to the packaging used in their supply-chain and wasted domestically. We conclude that international efforts need to assign shared responsibility and promote improvement in plastic packaging recyclability.
AB - While packaging is praised for reducing waste of perishable food products, packaging waste is a growing concern. Its least recyclable type, plastics waste, is increasingly polluting the marine environment and many developing countries are now refusing to take the waste from developed countries. Before responsibility can be established, one has to identify the key producers and consumers. This paper adjusts the packaging waste satellite account in EXIOBASE 3 by combining the official waste data published by the World Bank. Based on input–output methods, we find that the world's top suppliers of plastic packaging waste are the United States, China, and Brazil. Food and beverage products constitute the bulk of the problem. Yet, 21% of these countries’ plastic packaging waste is induced export. At the global level, it is 25.8%. About 76.0% of export-induced plastic packaging waste corresponds to packaging of the exported goods that will ultimately be disposed of in the destination country; while the others correspond to the packaging used in their supply-chain and wasted domestically. We conclude that international efforts need to assign shared responsibility and promote improvement in plastic packaging recyclability.
KW - environment responsibility
KW - environmental footprint
KW - global value chain
KW - industrial ecology
KW - input–output analysis
KW - plastic packaging waste
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130497651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130497651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jiec.13282
DO - 10.1111/jiec.13282
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85130497651
SN - 1088-1980
VL - 26
SP - 1460
EP - 1474
JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology
JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology
IS - 4
ER -