When News Norms Collide, Follow the Lead: New Evidence for Press Independence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The literature on media independence shows that the public statements of government officials can simultaneously stimulate news coverage and regulate the discursive parameters of that coverage. This study investigates two sources of uncertainty in that literature which have limited the ability of researchers to draw firm conclusions about the nature of media independence: how critical the news actually is, and how journalists put the indexing norm into practice. I examine policy discourse appearing in evening news broadcasts during the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis, and find that sources outside the institutions of American government produced far more discourse critical of American involvement in the Gulf crisis than was produced by the "official" debate among domestic political leaders. Moreover, changes in the amount of governmental criticism coming from official circles did not tend to produce parallel changes in the amount of critical news coverage. This suggests that criticism of government in evening news discourse was not triggered by or closely tied to patterns of gatekeeping among elected officials. Television news coverage did not merely toe the "line in the sand" drawn by the Bush administration. Instead, the evidence from this case suggests that journalists exercised considerable discretion in locating and airing oppositional voices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-414
Number of pages34
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Television
news
Sand
Lead
coverage
evidence
journalist
discourse
criticism
Persian Gulf
indexing
broadcast
Uncertainty
television
uncertainty
leader
ability

Keywords

  • Framing
  • Indexing hypothesis
  • Journalistic norms
  • News coverage
  • Persian Gulf crisis
  • Policy discourse
  • Press independence
  • Television news

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

When News Norms Collide, Follow the Lead : New Evidence for Press Independence. / Althaus, Scott L.

In: Political Communication, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.10.2003, p. 381-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f97f8bf98d4a4fd5b8b2dabd452e5369,
title = "When News Norms Collide, Follow the Lead: New Evidence for Press Independence",
abstract = "The literature on media independence shows that the public statements of government officials can simultaneously stimulate news coverage and regulate the discursive parameters of that coverage. This study investigates two sources of uncertainty in that literature which have limited the ability of researchers to draw firm conclusions about the nature of media independence: how critical the news actually is, and how journalists put the indexing norm into practice. I examine policy discourse appearing in evening news broadcasts during the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis, and find that sources outside the institutions of American government produced far more discourse critical of American involvement in the Gulf crisis than was produced by the {"}official{"} debate among domestic political leaders. Moreover, changes in the amount of governmental criticism coming from official circles did not tend to produce parallel changes in the amount of critical news coverage. This suggests that criticism of government in evening news discourse was not triggered by or closely tied to patterns of gatekeeping among elected officials. Television news coverage did not merely toe the {"}line in the sand{"} drawn by the Bush administration. Instead, the evidence from this case suggests that journalists exercised considerable discretion in locating and airing oppositional voices.",
keywords = "Framing, Indexing hypothesis, Journalistic norms, News coverage, Persian Gulf crisis, Policy discourse, Press independence, Television news",
author = "Althaus, {Scott L.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10584600390244158",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "381--414",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When News Norms Collide, Follow the Lead

T2 - New Evidence for Press Independence

AU - Althaus, Scott L.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - The literature on media independence shows that the public statements of government officials can simultaneously stimulate news coverage and regulate the discursive parameters of that coverage. This study investigates two sources of uncertainty in that literature which have limited the ability of researchers to draw firm conclusions about the nature of media independence: how critical the news actually is, and how journalists put the indexing norm into practice. I examine policy discourse appearing in evening news broadcasts during the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis, and find that sources outside the institutions of American government produced far more discourse critical of American involvement in the Gulf crisis than was produced by the "official" debate among domestic political leaders. Moreover, changes in the amount of governmental criticism coming from official circles did not tend to produce parallel changes in the amount of critical news coverage. This suggests that criticism of government in evening news discourse was not triggered by or closely tied to patterns of gatekeeping among elected officials. Television news coverage did not merely toe the "line in the sand" drawn by the Bush administration. Instead, the evidence from this case suggests that journalists exercised considerable discretion in locating and airing oppositional voices.

AB - The literature on media independence shows that the public statements of government officials can simultaneously stimulate news coverage and regulate the discursive parameters of that coverage. This study investigates two sources of uncertainty in that literature which have limited the ability of researchers to draw firm conclusions about the nature of media independence: how critical the news actually is, and how journalists put the indexing norm into practice. I examine policy discourse appearing in evening news broadcasts during the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf crisis, and find that sources outside the institutions of American government produced far more discourse critical of American involvement in the Gulf crisis than was produced by the "official" debate among domestic political leaders. Moreover, changes in the amount of governmental criticism coming from official circles did not tend to produce parallel changes in the amount of critical news coverage. This suggests that criticism of government in evening news discourse was not triggered by or closely tied to patterns of gatekeeping among elected officials. Television news coverage did not merely toe the "line in the sand" drawn by the Bush administration. Instead, the evidence from this case suggests that journalists exercised considerable discretion in locating and airing oppositional voices.

KW - Framing

KW - Indexing hypothesis

KW - Journalistic norms

KW - News coverage

KW - Persian Gulf crisis

KW - Policy discourse

KW - Press independence

KW - Television news

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344062632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344062632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584600390244158

DO - 10.1080/10584600390244158

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0344062632

VL - 20

SP - 381

EP - 414

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 4

ER -