When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis

Cameron M. Pittelkow, Bruce A. Linquist, Mark E. Lundy, Xinqiang Liang, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Juhwan Lee, Natasja van Gestel, Johan Six, Rodney T. Venterea, Chris van Kessel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6%) and largest for rice (-7.5%) and maize (-7.6%). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12% without N fertilizer addition and 4% with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-168
Number of pages13
JournalField Crops Research
Volume183
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

meta-analysis
no-tillage
tillage
crop
conventional tillage
cotton
wheat
maize
crops
productivity
yield response
climate
aridity
food production
development strategy
crop yield
limiting factor
cereal
trade-off
targeting

Keywords

  • Aridity
  • Crop rotation
  • Irrigation
  • Nitrogen
  • No-till duration
  • Residue
  • Tillage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Pittelkow, C. M., Linquist, B. A., Lundy, M. E., Liang, X., van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., ... van Kessel, C. (2015). When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 183, 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020

When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. / Pittelkow, Cameron M.; Linquist, Bruce A.; Lundy, Mark E.; Liang, Xinqiang; van Groenigen, Kees Jan; Lee, Juhwan; van Gestel, Natasja; Six, Johan; Venterea, Rodney T.; van Kessel, Chris.

In: Field Crops Research, Vol. 183, 01.11.2015, p. 156-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pittelkow, CM, Linquist, BA, Lundy, ME, Liang, X, van Groenigen, KJ, Lee, J, van Gestel, N, Six, J, Venterea, RT & van Kessel, C 2015, 'When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis', Field Crops Research, vol. 183, pp. 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020
Pittelkow CM, Linquist BA, Lundy ME, Liang X, van Groenigen KJ, Lee J et al. When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Research. 2015 Nov 1;183:156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020
Pittelkow, Cameron M. ; Linquist, Bruce A. ; Lundy, Mark E. ; Liang, Xinqiang ; van Groenigen, Kees Jan ; Lee, Juhwan ; van Gestel, Natasja ; Six, Johan ; Venterea, Rodney T. ; van Kessel, Chris. / When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. In: Field Crops Research. 2015 ; Vol. 183. pp. 156-168.
@article{290390fe8fbc4a2cb08fc70add55b408,
title = "When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis",
abstract = "No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6{\%}) and largest for rice (-7.5{\%}) and maize (-7.6{\%}). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12{\%} without N fertilizer addition and 4{\%} with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.",
keywords = "Aridity, Crop rotation, Irrigation, Nitrogen, No-till duration, Residue, Tillage",
author = "Pittelkow, {Cameron M.} and Linquist, {Bruce A.} and Lundy, {Mark E.} and Xinqiang Liang and {van Groenigen}, {Kees Jan} and Juhwan Lee and {van Gestel}, Natasja and Johan Six and Venterea, {Rodney T.} and {van Kessel}, Chris",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "156--168",
journal = "Field Crops Research",
issn = "0378-4290",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis

AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M.

AU - Linquist, Bruce A.

AU - Lundy, Mark E.

AU - Liang, Xinqiang

AU - van Groenigen, Kees Jan

AU - Lee, Juhwan

AU - van Gestel, Natasja

AU - Six, Johan

AU - Venterea, Rodney T.

AU - van Kessel, Chris

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6%) and largest for rice (-7.5%) and maize (-7.6%). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12% without N fertilizer addition and 4% with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.

AB - No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6%) and largest for rice (-7.5%) and maize (-7.6%). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12% without N fertilizer addition and 4% with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.

KW - Aridity

KW - Crop rotation

KW - Irrigation

KW - Nitrogen

KW - No-till duration

KW - Residue

KW - Tillage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939441364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939441364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020

DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939441364

VL - 183

SP - 156

EP - 168

JO - Field Crops Research

JF - Field Crops Research

SN - 0378-4290

ER -