TY - JOUR
T1 - When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis
AU - Pittelkow, Cameron M.
AU - Linquist, Bruce A.
AU - Lundy, Mark E.
AU - Liang, Xinqiang
AU - van Groenigen, Kees Jan
AU - Lee, Juhwan
AU - van Gestel, Natasja
AU - Six, Johan
AU - Venterea, Rodney T.
AU - van Kessel, Chris
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the National Key Science and Technology Project of China for supporting X.Q.L. with grant No. 2014ZX07101-012 . Natasja van Gestel and Kees Jan van Groenigen received financial support from U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program , under Award Number DE-SC-0010632 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6%) and largest for rice (-7.5%) and maize (-7.6%). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12% without N fertilizer addition and 4% with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.
AB - No-till agriculture represents a relatively widely adopted management system that aims to reduce soil erosion, decrease input costs, and sustain long-term crop productivity. However, its impacts on crop yields are variable, and an improved understanding of the factors limiting productivity is needed to support evidence-based management decisions. We conducted a global meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of various crop and environmental variables on no-till relative to conventional tillage yields using data obtained from peer-reviewed publications (678 studies with 6005 paired observations, representing 50 crops and 63 countries). Side-by-side yield comparisons were restricted to studies comparing conventional tillage to no-till practices in the absence of other cropping system modifications. Crop category was the most important factor influencing the overall yield response to no-till followed by aridity index, residue management, no-till duration, and N rate. No-till yields matched conventional tillage yields for oilseed, cotton, and legume crop categories. Among cereals, the negative impacts of no-till were smallest for wheat (-2.6%) and largest for rice (-7.5%) and maize (-7.6%). No-till performed best under rainfed conditions in dry climates, with yields often being equal to or higher than conventional tillage practices. Yields in the first 1-2 years following no-till implementation declined for all crops except oilseeds and cotton, but matched conventional tillage yields after 3-10 years except for maize and wheat in humid climates. Overall, no-till yields were reduced by 12% without N fertilizer addition and 4% with inorganic N addition. Our study highlights factors contributing to and/or decreasing no-till yield gaps and suggests that improved targeting and adaptation, possibly including additional system modifications, are necessary to optimize no-till performance and contribute to food production goals. In addition, our results provide a basis for conducting trade-off analyses to support the development of no-till crop management and international development strategies based on available scientific evidence.
KW - Aridity
KW - Crop rotation
KW - Irrigation
KW - Nitrogen
KW - No-till duration
KW - Residue
KW - Tillage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939441364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939441364&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020
DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939441364
SN - 0378-4290
VL - 183
SP - 156
EP - 168
JO - Field Crops Research
JF - Field Crops Research
ER -