TY - JOUR
T1 - When a District Calls for Commitment
T2 - Parents and Teachers Responding to Majoritarian Narratives in District Policy
AU - Taylor, Laura A.
AU - Marchand, Aixa D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 University of Massachusetts Amherst College of Education.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Educational policy both shapes and is shaped by dominant constructions of educational inequity. This article explores how such constructions are reproduced and disrupted during policy enactment through a case study examining one district’s promotion of their new literacy-based grade-retention policy. Drawing on Critical Race Theory and critical policy analysis, we analyzed data generated from video-cued interviews with 20 parents and teachers, in which they viewed and reacted to a district-created video promoting the policy. We illustrate how the video constructed a race-evasive, individualist majoritarian narrative that redirected responsibility for increasing literacy from the district as an institution to parents and families. Then, we consider how parents and teachers responded to the video’s narrative. This analysis both illustrates how many participants (re)produced this majoritarian narrative and how a subset of participants challenged this district framing. These findings illustrate how educational policy can reproduce majoritarian narratives that justify and perpetuate educational inequity.
AB - Educational policy both shapes and is shaped by dominant constructions of educational inequity. This article explores how such constructions are reproduced and disrupted during policy enactment through a case study examining one district’s promotion of their new literacy-based grade-retention policy. Drawing on Critical Race Theory and critical policy analysis, we analyzed data generated from video-cued interviews with 20 parents and teachers, in which they viewed and reacted to a district-created video promoting the policy. We illustrate how the video constructed a race-evasive, individualist majoritarian narrative that redirected responsibility for increasing literacy from the district as an institution to parents and families. Then, we consider how parents and teachers responded to the video’s narrative. This analysis both illustrates how many participants (re)produced this majoritarian narrative and how a subset of participants challenged this district framing. These findings illustrate how educational policy can reproduce majoritarian narratives that justify and perpetuate educational inequity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214684837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85214684837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10665684.2024.2444968
DO - 10.1080/10665684.2024.2444968
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85214684837
SN - 1066-5684
JO - Equity and Excellence in Education
JF - Equity and Excellence in Education
ER -