Abstract
Purpose: The authors sought to trace the development of the teaching personal and social responsibility (TPSR) model from its initial conception by Don Hellison as a humanistic approach to teaching physical education to the current version of the model through qualitative historiography. Methods: Data sources included: (a) books written by Don, (b) sources that discussed the evolution of the model, and (c) supplemental texts that are important to the TPSR literature. Results: The authors identified four phases of TPSR model development: (a) setting the stage for a humanistic approach through practical inquiry, (b) moving beyond balls and bats to developing a model focused on the affective domain, (c) further defining humanistic goals and teaching strategies, and (d) continuous tinkering in the context of a living model. Discussion/Conclusions: Lessons learned about the model are discussed in relation to practical inquiry, and recommendations are made related to the future of the TPSR model.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 300-310 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Teaching in Physical Education |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2020 |
Keywords
- Don Hellison
- Humanistic physical education
- Models-based practice
- Practical inquiry
- Qualitative historiography
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“What’s Worth Doing?”: A Qualitative Historical Analysis of the TPSR Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS