What Was the President’s Standpoint and When Did He Take It? A Normative Pragmatic Study of Standpoint Emergence in a Presidential Press Conference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In contrast to views that treat positions and standpoints as defining the scope of argumen-tation, our normative pragmatic approach sees positions and standpoints as interactionally emergent products of argumentative work. Here, this is shown in a detailed case study of a question-answer session in which former US President Donald J. Trump was pressed by journalists to express and defend his standpoint on the Charlottesville protests by neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Trump repeatedly evaded efforts to pin down his standpoint; however, with each of his answers to the questions, his built-up position circumscribed the range of possible standpoints he could take. To the end, he avoided backing down from any prior statement expressing his standpoint, while also preserving a degree of maneuverability regarding what his standpoint amounted to.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number153
JournalLanguages
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • normative pragmatics
  • standpoints
  • press conference
  • interactional emergence
  • implicature
  • disagreement management
  • conversational interaction
  • commitments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Was the President’s Standpoint and When Did He Take It? A Normative Pragmatic Study of Standpoint Emergence in a Presidential Press Conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this