Abstract
In contrast to views that treat positions and standpoints as defining the scope of argumen-tation, our normative pragmatic approach sees positions and standpoints as interactionally emergent products of argumentative work. Here, this is shown in a detailed case study of a question-answer session in which former US President Donald J. Trump was pressed by journalists to express and defend his standpoint on the Charlottesville protests by neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Trump repeatedly evaded efforts to pin down his standpoint; however, with each of his answers to the questions, his built-up position circumscribed the range of possible standpoints he could take. To the end, he avoided backing down from any prior statement expressing his standpoint, while also preserving a degree of maneuverability regarding what his standpoint amounted to.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 153 |
Journal | Languages |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- argumentation
- normative pragmatics
- standpoints
- press conference
- interactional emergence
- implicature
- disagreement management
- conversational interaction
- commitments
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language