What Makes Hypocrisy? Folk Definitions, Attitude/Behavior Combinations, Attitude Strength, and Private/Public Distinctions

Sean Michael Laurent, Brian A.M. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Past research has rarely examined what makes behaviors appear more or less hypocritical. This work expands our understanding, identifying and exploring factors contributing to perception of hypocrisy. An initial study surveyed participants’ definitions of the concept. Experiments 2a/2b then demonstrate that attitude–behavior inconsistency is viewed as most hypocritical, followed by attitude-attitude and behavior-behavior inconsistency. Experiments 3 and 4 examined how perception of hypocrisy depends on attitude strength, communication method, and whether attitudes/behaviors are privately or publicly held/enacted. We conclude that hypocrisy is perceived as strongest when attitudes are publicly imposed on others in an attempt to appear morally superior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-121
Number of pages18
JournalBasic and Applied Social Psychology
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 4 2019

Fingerprint

Communication
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

What Makes Hypocrisy? Folk Definitions, Attitude/Behavior Combinations, Attitude Strength, and Private/Public Distinctions. / Laurent, Sean Michael; Clark, Brian A.M.

In: Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 2, 04.03.2019, p. 104-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1604e975f9ec42cbb9e58ec7b84e0225,
title = "What Makes Hypocrisy? Folk Definitions, Attitude/Behavior Combinations, Attitude Strength, and Private/Public Distinctions",
abstract = "Past research has rarely examined what makes behaviors appear more or less hypocritical. This work expands our understanding, identifying and exploring factors contributing to perception of hypocrisy. An initial study surveyed participants’ definitions of the concept. Experiments 2a/2b then demonstrate that attitude–behavior inconsistency is viewed as most hypocritical, followed by attitude-attitude and behavior-behavior inconsistency. Experiments 3 and 4 examined how perception of hypocrisy depends on attitude strength, communication method, and whether attitudes/behaviors are privately or publicly held/enacted. We conclude that hypocrisy is perceived as strongest when attitudes are publicly imposed on others in an attempt to appear morally superior.",
author = "Laurent, {Sean Michael} and Clark, {Brian A.M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/01973533.2018.1556160",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "104--121",
journal = "Basic and Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0197-3533",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Makes Hypocrisy? Folk Definitions, Attitude/Behavior Combinations, Attitude Strength, and Private/Public Distinctions

AU - Laurent, Sean Michael

AU - Clark, Brian A.M.

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Past research has rarely examined what makes behaviors appear more or less hypocritical. This work expands our understanding, identifying and exploring factors contributing to perception of hypocrisy. An initial study surveyed participants’ definitions of the concept. Experiments 2a/2b then demonstrate that attitude–behavior inconsistency is viewed as most hypocritical, followed by attitude-attitude and behavior-behavior inconsistency. Experiments 3 and 4 examined how perception of hypocrisy depends on attitude strength, communication method, and whether attitudes/behaviors are privately or publicly held/enacted. We conclude that hypocrisy is perceived as strongest when attitudes are publicly imposed on others in an attempt to appear morally superior.

AB - Past research has rarely examined what makes behaviors appear more or less hypocritical. This work expands our understanding, identifying and exploring factors contributing to perception of hypocrisy. An initial study surveyed participants’ definitions of the concept. Experiments 2a/2b then demonstrate that attitude–behavior inconsistency is viewed as most hypocritical, followed by attitude-attitude and behavior-behavior inconsistency. Experiments 3 and 4 examined how perception of hypocrisy depends on attitude strength, communication method, and whether attitudes/behaviors are privately or publicly held/enacted. We conclude that hypocrisy is perceived as strongest when attitudes are publicly imposed on others in an attempt to appear morally superior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061322935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061322935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01973533.2018.1556160

DO - 10.1080/01973533.2018.1556160

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061322935

VL - 41

SP - 104

EP - 121

JO - Basic and Applied Social Psychology

JF - Basic and Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0197-3533

IS - 2

ER -