Abstract
We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) claim that theories of language processing must address the interconnection of language production and comprehension. However, we have two concerns: First, the central notion of context when predicting what another person will say is underspecified. Second, it is not clear that P&G's dual-mechanism model captures the data better than a single-mechanism model would.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 376-377 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience