@inbook{10818c380c6041899e4f1b060d579f68,
title = "What Do NLRB Cases Reveal about Non-Union Employee Representation Groups? A Typology from Post–Electromation Cases",
abstract = "Since the late 1800s, unions and employers have competed with each other to offer representation groups to employees. In general, these groups have aimed to provide a voice to workers in aspects of their employment. These groups have widely differed, however. Employers have formed some representation groups with progressive aims: to empower individuals to manage their work, to share information about improving a work process, and more broadly, to feel a sense of ownership in the fi rm. Other groups have extended compensation beyond wages by seeking employee input in designing benefi ts-for example, a pension plan in the 1920s or child care at work in the 1990s. Other employers have formed groups to mimic a union{\textquoteright}s functions, believing that a company union is better able than an independent union to voice the interests of employees.",
author = "LeRoy, {Michael H.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Taylor & Francis.",
year = "2014",
month = sep,
day = "3",
doi = "10.4324/9780203110638",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780415537216",
series = "Routledge Research in Employment Relations",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "366--393",
editor = "Gollan, {Paul J} and Kaufman, {Bruce E} and Daphne Taras and Adrian Wilkinson",
booktitle = "Voice and Involvement at Work",
address = "United States",
}