Wh-questions used as challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article uses a conversation analytic framework to describe a type of wh-question used to challenge a prior utterance, specifically to challenge the basis for or right to do an action done by the prior utterance. These wh-questions are able to do challenging because, rather than asking for new information, they are used to convey a strong epistemic stance of the questioner, a negative assertion. The utterances are designed as requests for an account for a prior claim or action, but by conveying a negative assertion, they suggest that there is no adequate account available and, thus, that there are no grounds for the prior claim or action. The use of these questions in institutional settings can display participants' orientation to institutional goals, norms and roles, showing that institutional roles can thus be enacted, and goals accomplished, by means of practices of talk which are not, themselves, institutionally specific.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-77
Number of pages27
JournalDiscourse Studies
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2003

Keywords

  • challenges
  • conversation analysis
  • preference structure
  • rhetorical questions
  • wh-questions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wh-questions used as challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this