TY - JOUR
T1 - Wet etch, dry etch, and MacEtch of β-Ga2O3
T2 - A review of characteristics and mechanism
AU - Huang, Hsien Chih
AU - Ren, Zhongjie
AU - Chan, Clarence
AU - Li, Xiuling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Materials Research Society.
PY - 2021/12/14
Y1 - 2021/12/14
N2 - β-Ga2O3, a promising ultra-wide bandgap material for future high-power electronics and deep-ultraviolet optoelectronics applications, has drawn tremendous attention in recent years due to its wide bandgap of ~ 4.8 eV, high breakdown electric field, and availability of substrates. However, the reported etch behavior of β-Ga2O3 and the quality of etched surfaces, as well as the associated interface characteristics, could limit the performance of β-Ga2O3 devices. In this article, the etchings of β-Ga2O3, including regular wet etching, photoelectrochemical etching (PEC), reactive ion etching (RIE) and metal-assisted chemical etching (MacEtch), are reviewed. A comparison of the etch rate, orientation dependence, aspect ratio, etching mechanism, and surface quality for each of these etching methods is presented and the step-by-step reactions in PEC and MacEtch are proposed to elucidate the etch mechanism. The challenges for these etching techniques for β-Ga2O3 are discussed. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - β-Ga2O3, a promising ultra-wide bandgap material for future high-power electronics and deep-ultraviolet optoelectronics applications, has drawn tremendous attention in recent years due to its wide bandgap of ~ 4.8 eV, high breakdown electric field, and availability of substrates. However, the reported etch behavior of β-Ga2O3 and the quality of etched surfaces, as well as the associated interface characteristics, could limit the performance of β-Ga2O3 devices. In this article, the etchings of β-Ga2O3, including regular wet etching, photoelectrochemical etching (PEC), reactive ion etching (RIE) and metal-assisted chemical etching (MacEtch), are reviewed. A comparison of the etch rate, orientation dependence, aspect ratio, etching mechanism, and surface quality for each of these etching methods is presented and the step-by-step reactions in PEC and MacEtch are proposed to elucidate the etch mechanism. The challenges for these etching techniques for β-Ga2O3 are discussed. Graphic abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Electronic material
KW - Ga
KW - Nanostructure
KW - Oxide
KW - Photochemical
KW - Reactive ion etching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119108802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119108802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1557/s43578-021-00413-0
DO - 10.1557/s43578-021-00413-0
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85119108802
SN - 0884-2914
VL - 36
SP - 4756
EP - 4770
JO - Journal of Materials Research
JF - Journal of Materials Research
IS - 23
ER -