Were Bush tax cut supporters "simply ignorant?" a second look at conservatives and liberals in "homer gets a tax cut"

Arthur Lupia, Adam Seth Levine, Jesse O. Menning, Gisela Sin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


In a recent issue of Perspectives on Politics, Larry Barrels examines the high levels of support for tax cuts signed into law by President Bush in 2001. In so doing, he characterizes the opinions of "ordinary people" as lacking "a moral basis" and as being based on "simple-minded and sometimes misguided considerations of self interest." He concludes that "the strong plurality support for Bush's tax cut... is entirely attributable to simple ignorance." Our analysis of the same data reveals different results. We show that for a large and politically relevant class of respondents, conservatives and Republicans, rising information levels increase support for the tax cuts. In fact, Republican respondents rated "most informed" supported the tax cuts at extraordinarily high levels (over 96 percent). For these citizens, Bartels' claim that "betterinformed respondents were much more likely to express negative views about the 2001. tax cut" is untrue. Bartels' results depend on the strong assumption that if more information about the tax cut makes liberals less likely to support it, then conservatives must follow suit. Our analysis allows groups to process information in different ways and can better help political entrepreneurs better reconcile critical social needs with citizens' desires.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)773-784
Number of pages12
JournalPerspectives on Politics
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations


Dive into the research topics of 'Were Bush tax cut supporters "simply ignorant?" a second look at conservatives and liberals in "homer gets a tax cut"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this