Weed science research and funding: A call to action

Adam S. Davis, J. Christopher Hall, Marie Jasieniuk, Martin A. Locke, Edward C. Luschei, David A. Mortensen, Dean E. Riechers, Richard G. Smith, Tracy M. Sterling, James H. Westwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy testing and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the survey, a response rate of 23%. The largest group of respondents (41%) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22%) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups ofscientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-448
Number of pages7
JournalWeed Science
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

Fingerprint

weed science
funding
herbicides
weeds
vegetation
ecological restoration
natural resource management
ecologists
molecular biology
biologists
weed control
forestry
physiology
agriculture
industry
Biological Sciences
history
summer
testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Davis, A. S., Hall, J. C., Jasieniuk, M., Locke, M. A., Luschei, E. C., Mortensen, D. A., ... Westwood, J. H. (2009). Weed science research and funding: A call to action. Weed Science, 57(4), 442-448. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-020.1

Weed science research and funding : A call to action. / Davis, Adam S.; Hall, J. Christopher; Jasieniuk, Marie; Locke, Martin A.; Luschei, Edward C.; Mortensen, David A.; Riechers, Dean E.; Smith, Richard G.; Sterling, Tracy M.; Westwood, James H.

In: Weed Science, Vol. 57, No. 4, 01.07.2009, p. 442-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, AS, Hall, JC, Jasieniuk, M, Locke, MA, Luschei, EC, Mortensen, DA, Riechers, DE, Smith, RG, Sterling, TM & Westwood, JH 2009, 'Weed science research and funding: A call to action', Weed Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 442-448. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-020.1
Davis AS, Hall JC, Jasieniuk M, Locke MA, Luschei EC, Mortensen DA et al. Weed science research and funding: A call to action. Weed Science. 2009 Jul 1;57(4):442-448. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-020.1
Davis, Adam S. ; Hall, J. Christopher ; Jasieniuk, Marie ; Locke, Martin A. ; Luschei, Edward C. ; Mortensen, David A. ; Riechers, Dean E. ; Smith, Richard G. ; Sterling, Tracy M. ; Westwood, James H. / Weed science research and funding : A call to action. In: Weed Science. 2009 ; Vol. 57, No. 4. pp. 442-448.
@article{59353081933a4210878c63e415586547,
title = "Weed science research and funding: A call to action",
abstract = "Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy testing and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the survey, a response rate of 23{\%}. The largest group of respondents (41{\%}) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22{\%}) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups ofscientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.",
author = "Davis, {Adam S.} and Hall, {J. Christopher} and Marie Jasieniuk and Locke, {Martin A.} and Luschei, {Edward C.} and Mortensen, {David A.} and Riechers, {Dean E.} and Smith, {Richard G.} and Sterling, {Tracy M.} and Westwood, {James H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1614/WS-09-020.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "442--448",
journal = "Weed Science",
issn = "0043-1745",
publisher = "Weed Science Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weed science research and funding

T2 - A call to action

AU - Davis, Adam S.

AU - Hall, J. Christopher

AU - Jasieniuk, Marie

AU - Locke, Martin A.

AU - Luschei, Edward C.

AU - Mortensen, David A.

AU - Riechers, Dean E.

AU - Smith, Richard G.

AU - Sterling, Tracy M.

AU - Westwood, James H.

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy testing and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the survey, a response rate of 23%. The largest group of respondents (41%) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22%) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups ofscientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.

AB - Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy testing and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the survey, a response rate of 23%. The largest group of respondents (41%) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22%) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups ofscientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68849126883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68849126883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1614/WS-09-020.1

DO - 10.1614/WS-09-020.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68849126883

VL - 57

SP - 442

EP - 448

JO - Weed Science

JF - Weed Science

SN - 0043-1745

IS - 4

ER -