Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management

Doria R. Gordon; S. Luke Flory; Deah Lieurance; Philip E. Hulme; Chris Buddenhagen; Barney Caton; Paul D. Champion; Theresa M. Culley; Curt Daehler; Franz Essl; Jeffrey E. Hill; Reuben P. Keller; Lisa Kohl; Anthony L. Koop; Sabrina Kumschick; David M. Lodge; Richard N. Mack; Laura A. Meyerson; Godshen R. Pallipparambil; F. Dane Panetta; Read Porter; Petr Pysek; Lauren D. Quinn; David M. Richardson; Daniel Simberloff; Montserrat Vila

doi:10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management

Doria R. Gordon
, S. Luke Flory
, Deah Lieurance
, Philip E. Hulme
, Chris Buddenhagen
, Barney Caton
, Paul D. Champion
, Theresa M. Culley
, Curt Daehler
, Franz Essl
, Jeffrey E. Hill
, Reuben P. Keller
, Lisa Kohl
, Anthony L. Koop
, Sabrina Kumschick
, David M. Lodge
, Richard N. Mack
, Laura A. Meyerson
, Godshen R. Pallipparambil
, F. Dane Panetta

Read Porter, Petr Pysek, Lauren D. Quinn, David M. Richardson, Daniel Simberloff, Montserrat Vila

Illinois Sustainable Technology Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Smith et al. (2015) recently proposed that weed risk assessments (WRA) systems "are unable to accurately address broad, intraspecific variation and that species introduced for agronomic purposes pose special limitations." This conclusion is drawn from their application of the Australian (A-WRS) and U.S. (US-WRA) weed reis assessment systems to evaluate proposed bioenergy crops, cultivated crops, and know invasive nonnative plants. We do not believe that this conclusion is robust and question the approach and outcome of their comparative study. Our view is that this study misrepresents the utility of WRA tools...

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	81-83
Number of pages	3
Journal	Invasive Plant Science and Management
Volume	9
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1
State	Published - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

ISTC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Plant Science

Online availability

10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

Gordon, D. R., Flory, S. L., Lieurance, D., Hulme, P. E., Buddenhagen, C., Caton, B., Champion, P. D., Culley, T. M., Daehler, C., Essl, F., Hill, J. E., Keller, R. P., Kohl, L., Koop, A. L., Kumschick, S., Lodge, D. M., Mack, R. N., Meyerson, L. A., Pallipparambil, G. R., ... Vila, M. (2016). Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 9(1), 81-83. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

Gordon, DR, Flory, SL, Lieurance, D, Hulme, PE, Buddenhagen, C, Caton, B, Champion, PD, Culley, TM, Daehler, C, Essl, F, Hill, JE, Keller, RP, Kohl, L, Koop, AL, Kumschick, S, Lodge, DM, Mack, RN, Meyerson, LA, Pallipparambil, GR, Panetta, FD, Porter, R, Pysek, P, Quinn, LD, Richardson, DM, Simberloff, D & Vila, M 2016, 'Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management', Invasive Plant Science and Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81-83. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

@article{a7e5d876febb49a599fc45c1b026d7c1,

title = "Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management",

abstract = "Smith et al. (2015) recently proposed that weed risk assessments (WRA) systems {"}are unable to accurately address broad, intraspecific variation and that species introduced for agronomic purposes pose special limitations.{"} This conclusion is drawn from their application of the Australian (A-WRS) and U.S. (US-WRA) weed reis assessment systems to evaluate proposed bioenergy crops, cultivated crops, and know invasive nonnative plants. We do not believe that this conclusion is robust and question the approach and outcome of their comparative study. Our view is that this study misrepresents the utility of WRA tools...",

keywords = "ISTC",

author = "Gordon, \{Doria R.\} and Flory, \{S. Luke\} and Deah Lieurance and Hulme, \{Philip E.\} and Chris Buddenhagen and Barney Caton and Champion, \{Paul D.\} and Culley, \{Theresa M.\} and Curt Daehler and Franz Essl and Hill, \{Jeffrey E.\} and Keller, \{Reuben P.\} and Lisa Kohl and Koop, \{Anthony L.\} and Sabrina Kumschick and Lodge, \{David M.\} and Mack, \{Richard N.\} and Meyerson, \{Laura A.\} and Pallipparambil, \{Godshen R.\} and Panetta, \{F. Dane\} and Read Porter and Petr Pysek and Quinn, \{Lauren D.\} and Richardson, \{David M.\} and Daniel Simberloff and Montserrat Vila",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

pages = "81--83",

journal = "Invasive Plant Science and Management",

issn = "1939-7291",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management

AU - Gordon, Doria R.

AU - Flory, S. Luke

AU - Lieurance, Deah

AU - Hulme, Philip E.

AU - Buddenhagen, Chris

AU - Caton, Barney

AU - Champion, Paul D.

AU - Culley, Theresa M.

AU - Daehler, Curt

AU - Essl, Franz

AU - Hill, Jeffrey E.

AU - Keller, Reuben P.

AU - Kohl, Lisa

AU - Koop, Anthony L.

AU - Kumschick, Sabrina

AU - Lodge, David M.

AU - Mack, Richard N.

AU - Meyerson, Laura A.

AU - Pallipparambil, Godshen R.

AU - Panetta, F. Dane

AU - Porter, Read

AU - Pysek, Petr

AU - Quinn, Lauren D.

AU - Richardson, David M.

AU - Simberloff, Daniel

AU - Vila, Montserrat

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Smith et al. (2015) recently proposed that weed risk assessments (WRA) systems "are unable to accurately address broad, intraspecific variation and that species introduced for agronomic purposes pose special limitations." This conclusion is drawn from their application of the Australian (A-WRS) and U.S. (US-WRA) weed reis assessment systems to evaluate proposed bioenergy crops, cultivated crops, and know invasive nonnative plants. We do not believe that this conclusion is robust and question the approach and outcome of their comparative study. Our view is that this study misrepresents the utility of WRA tools...

AB - Smith et al. (2015) recently proposed that weed risk assessments (WRA) systems "are unable to accurately address broad, intraspecific variation and that species introduced for agronomic purposes pose special limitations." This conclusion is drawn from their application of the Australian (A-WRS) and U.S. (US-WRA) weed reis assessment systems to evaluate proposed bioenergy crops, cultivated crops, and know invasive nonnative plants. We do not believe that this conclusion is robust and question the approach and outcome of their comparative study. Our view is that this study misrepresents the utility of WRA tools...

KW - ISTC

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964294708

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964294708#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

DO - 10.1614/IPSM-D-15-00053.1

M3 - Review article

SN - 1939-7291

VL - 9

SP - 81

EP - 83

JO - Invasive Plant Science and Management

JF - Invasive Plant Science and Management

IS - 1

ER -

Weed Risk Assessments Are an Effective Component of Invasion Risk Management

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this