Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean 1

Ryan F. Hasty, Christy L. Sprague, Aaron G Hager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during 1999 and 2000 to compare weed control after fall and early-preplant (EPP) herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Three residual treatments (chlor- imuron plus metribuzin, chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone, and metribuzin) were applied at two rates and timings (fall and 30 d EPP) either alone or in combination with glyphosate and 2,4-D. The addition of glyphosate and 2,4-D to fall-applied residual herbicides significantly increased control of common chickweed, annual bluegrass, cressleaf groundsel, and shepherd's-purse. The effect of application rate on weed control was species dependent. Fall-applied residual herbicides were comparable with EPP treatments with respect to winter annual weed control; however, at planting control of summer annual weed species with fall treatments was less consistent compared with EPP residual herbicides.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)887-892
Number of pages6
JournalWeed Technology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

pesticide application
chlorimuron
no-tillage
weed control
metribuzin
annual weeds
herbicides
soybeans
glyphosate
2,4-D
sulfentrazone
Capsella bursa-pastoris
Stellaria media
Poa annua
application rate
planting
winter
summer

Keywords

  • AMATA
  • AMBEL
  • AMBTR
  • CHEAL
  • Fall applied
  • LAMAM
  • LAMPU
  • No till
  • Residual control
  • Winter annuals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean 1 . / Hasty, Ryan F.; Sprague, Christy L.; Hager, Aaron G.

In: Weed Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.10.2004, p. 887-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasty, Ryan F. ; Sprague, Christy L. ; Hager, Aaron G. / Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean 1 In: Weed Technology. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 887-892.
@article{549a8423dffd43dcb782782ce95f1a7c,
title = "Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean 1",
abstract = "Field studies were conducted during 1999 and 2000 to compare weed control after fall and early-preplant (EPP) herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Three residual treatments (chlor- imuron plus metribuzin, chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone, and metribuzin) were applied at two rates and timings (fall and 30 d EPP) either alone or in combination with glyphosate and 2,4-D. The addition of glyphosate and 2,4-D to fall-applied residual herbicides significantly increased control of common chickweed, annual bluegrass, cressleaf groundsel, and shepherd's-purse. The effect of application rate on weed control was species dependent. Fall-applied residual herbicides were comparable with EPP treatments with respect to winter annual weed control; however, at planting control of summer annual weed species with fall treatments was less consistent compared with EPP residual herbicides.",
keywords = "AMATA, AMBEL, AMBTR, CHEAL, Fall applied, LAMAM, LAMPU, No till, Residual control, Winter annuals",
author = "Hasty, {Ryan F.} and Sprague, {Christy L.} and Hager, {Aaron G}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1614/WT-03-041R3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "887--892",
journal = "Weed Technology",
issn = "0890-037X",
publisher = "Weed Science Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean 1

AU - Hasty, Ryan F.

AU - Sprague, Christy L.

AU - Hager, Aaron G

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - Field studies were conducted during 1999 and 2000 to compare weed control after fall and early-preplant (EPP) herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Three residual treatments (chlor- imuron plus metribuzin, chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone, and metribuzin) were applied at two rates and timings (fall and 30 d EPP) either alone or in combination with glyphosate and 2,4-D. The addition of glyphosate and 2,4-D to fall-applied residual herbicides significantly increased control of common chickweed, annual bluegrass, cressleaf groundsel, and shepherd's-purse. The effect of application rate on weed control was species dependent. Fall-applied residual herbicides were comparable with EPP treatments with respect to winter annual weed control; however, at planting control of summer annual weed species with fall treatments was less consistent compared with EPP residual herbicides.

AB - Field studies were conducted during 1999 and 2000 to compare weed control after fall and early-preplant (EPP) herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Three residual treatments (chlor- imuron plus metribuzin, chlorimuron plus sulfentrazone, and metribuzin) were applied at two rates and timings (fall and 30 d EPP) either alone or in combination with glyphosate and 2,4-D. The addition of glyphosate and 2,4-D to fall-applied residual herbicides significantly increased control of common chickweed, annual bluegrass, cressleaf groundsel, and shepherd's-purse. The effect of application rate on weed control was species dependent. Fall-applied residual herbicides were comparable with EPP treatments with respect to winter annual weed control; however, at planting control of summer annual weed species with fall treatments was less consistent compared with EPP residual herbicides.

KW - AMATA

KW - AMBEL

KW - AMBTR

KW - CHEAL

KW - Fall applied

KW - LAMAM

KW - LAMPU

KW - No till

KW - Residual control

KW - Winter annuals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549040278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549040278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1614/WT-03-041R3

DO - 10.1614/WT-03-041R3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36549040278

VL - 18

SP - 887

EP - 892

JO - Weed Technology

JF - Weed Technology

SN - 0890-037X

IS - 4

ER -