TY - JOUR
T1 - Visually validated semi-automatic high-frequency oscillation detection aides the delineation of epileptogenic regions during intra-operative electrocorticography
AU - Weiss, Shennan Aibel
AU - Berry, Brent
AU - Chervoneva, Inna
AU - Waldman, Zachary
AU - Guba, Jonathan
AU - Bower, Mark
AU - Kucewicz, Michal
AU - Brinkmann, Benjamin
AU - Kremen, Vaclav
AU - Khadjevand, Fatemeh
AU - Varatharajah, Yogatheesan
AU - Guragain, Hari
AU - Sharan, Ashwini
AU - Wu, Chengyuan
AU - Staba, Richard
AU - Engel, Jerome
AU - Sperling, Michael
AU - Worrell, Gregory
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Objective: To test the utility of a novel semi-automated method for detecting, validating, and quantifying high-frequency oscillations (HFOs): ripples (80–200 Hz) and fast ripples (200–600 Hz) in intra-operative electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings. Methods: Sixteen adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) had intra-operative ECoG recordings at the time of resection. The computer-annotated ECoG recordings were visually inspected and false positive detections were removed. We retrospectively determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of HFO detections in unresected regions for determining post-operative seizure outcome. Results: Visual validation revealed that 2.81% of ripple and 43.68% of fast ripple detections were false positive. Inter-reader agreement for false positive fast ripple on spike classification was good (ICC = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.632–0.779). After removing false positive detections, the PPV of a single fast ripple on spike in an unresected electrode site for post-operative non-seizure free outcome was 85.7 [50–100%]. Including false positive detections reduced the PPV to 64.2 [57.8–69.83%]. Conclusions: Applying automated HFO methods to intraoperative electrocorticography recordings results in false positive fast ripple detections. True fast ripples on spikes are rare, but predict non-seizure free post-operative outcome if found in an unresected site. Significance: Semi-automated HFO detection methods are required to accurately identify fast ripple events in intra-operative ECoG recordings.
AB - Objective: To test the utility of a novel semi-automated method for detecting, validating, and quantifying high-frequency oscillations (HFOs): ripples (80–200 Hz) and fast ripples (200–600 Hz) in intra-operative electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings. Methods: Sixteen adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) had intra-operative ECoG recordings at the time of resection. The computer-annotated ECoG recordings were visually inspected and false positive detections were removed. We retrospectively determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of HFO detections in unresected regions for determining post-operative seizure outcome. Results: Visual validation revealed that 2.81% of ripple and 43.68% of fast ripple detections were false positive. Inter-reader agreement for false positive fast ripple on spike classification was good (ICC = 0.713, 95% CI: 0.632–0.779). After removing false positive detections, the PPV of a single fast ripple on spike in an unresected electrode site for post-operative non-seizure free outcome was 85.7 [50–100%]. Including false positive detections reduced the PPV to 64.2 [57.8–69.83%]. Conclusions: Applying automated HFO methods to intraoperative electrocorticography recordings results in false positive fast ripple detections. True fast ripples on spikes are rare, but predict non-seizure free post-operative outcome if found in an unresected site. Significance: Semi-automated HFO detection methods are required to accurately identify fast ripple events in intra-operative ECoG recordings.
KW - Electrocorticography
KW - Fast ripple
KW - High-frequency oscillation
KW - Ripple
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050865278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050865278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.06.030
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.06.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 30077870
AN - SCOPUS:85050865278
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 129
SP - 2089
EP - 2098
JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control
IS - 10
ER -