Visualizing Revision: Leveraging Student-Generated Between-Draft Diagramming Data in Support of Academic Writing Development

Justin Olmanson, Katrina Kennett, Alecia Magnifico, Sarah McCarthey, Duane Searsmith, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Once writers complete a first draft, they are often encouraged to evaluate their writing and prioritize what to revise. Yet, this process can be both daunting and difficult. This study looks at how students used a semantic concept mapping tool to re-present the content and organization of their initial draft of an informational text. We examine the processes of students at two different schools as they remediated their own texts and how those processes impacted the development of their rhetorical, conceptual, and communicative capacities. Our analysis suggests that students creating visualizations of their completed first drafts scaffolded self-evaluation. The mapping tool aided visualization by converting compositions into discrete persistent visual data elements that represented concepts and connections. This often led to students’ meta-awareness of what was missing or misaligned in their draft. Our findings have implications for how students approach, educators perceive, and designers support the drafting and revision process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-123
Number of pages25
JournalTechnology, Knowledge and Learning
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Students
Visualization
student
visualization
Semantics
writer
semantics
Evaluate
educator
Evaluation
organization
present
Chemical analysis
evaluation
school
Concepts
Text
Vision
Awareness

Keywords

  • Academic literacy
  • Informative writing
  • Metacognition
  • Rereading
  • Revision
  • Technology
  • Writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Visualizing Revision : Leveraging Student-Generated Between-Draft Diagramming Data in Support of Academic Writing Development. / Olmanson, Justin; Kennett, Katrina; Magnifico, Alecia; McCarthey, Sarah; Searsmith, Duane; Cope, Bill; Kalantzis, Mary.

In: Technology, Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.04.2016, p. 99-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6fcf565b2da4749a3854f8cb319d1af,
title = "Visualizing Revision: Leveraging Student-Generated Between-Draft Diagramming Data in Support of Academic Writing Development",
abstract = "Once writers complete a first draft, they are often encouraged to evaluate their writing and prioritize what to revise. Yet, this process can be both daunting and difficult. This study looks at how students used a semantic concept mapping tool to re-present the content and organization of their initial draft of an informational text. We examine the processes of students at two different schools as they remediated their own texts and how those processes impacted the development of their rhetorical, conceptual, and communicative capacities. Our analysis suggests that students creating visualizations of their completed first drafts scaffolded self-evaluation. The mapping tool aided visualization by converting compositions into discrete persistent visual data elements that represented concepts and connections. This often led to students’ meta-awareness of what was missing or misaligned in their draft. Our findings have implications for how students approach, educators perceive, and designers support the drafting and revision process.",
keywords = "Academic literacy, Informative writing, Metacognition, Rereading, Revision, Technology, Writing",
author = "Justin Olmanson and Katrina Kennett and Alecia Magnifico and Sarah McCarthey and Duane Searsmith and Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10758-015-9265-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "99--123",
journal = "Technology, Knowledge and Learning",
issn = "2211-1662",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualizing Revision

T2 - Leveraging Student-Generated Between-Draft Diagramming Data in Support of Academic Writing Development

AU - Olmanson, Justin

AU - Kennett, Katrina

AU - Magnifico, Alecia

AU - McCarthey, Sarah

AU - Searsmith, Duane

AU - Cope, Bill

AU - Kalantzis, Mary

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Once writers complete a first draft, they are often encouraged to evaluate their writing and prioritize what to revise. Yet, this process can be both daunting and difficult. This study looks at how students used a semantic concept mapping tool to re-present the content and organization of their initial draft of an informational text. We examine the processes of students at two different schools as they remediated their own texts and how those processes impacted the development of their rhetorical, conceptual, and communicative capacities. Our analysis suggests that students creating visualizations of their completed first drafts scaffolded self-evaluation. The mapping tool aided visualization by converting compositions into discrete persistent visual data elements that represented concepts and connections. This often led to students’ meta-awareness of what was missing or misaligned in their draft. Our findings have implications for how students approach, educators perceive, and designers support the drafting and revision process.

AB - Once writers complete a first draft, they are often encouraged to evaluate their writing and prioritize what to revise. Yet, this process can be both daunting and difficult. This study looks at how students used a semantic concept mapping tool to re-present the content and organization of their initial draft of an informational text. We examine the processes of students at two different schools as they remediated their own texts and how those processes impacted the development of their rhetorical, conceptual, and communicative capacities. Our analysis suggests that students creating visualizations of their completed first drafts scaffolded self-evaluation. The mapping tool aided visualization by converting compositions into discrete persistent visual data elements that represented concepts and connections. This often led to students’ meta-awareness of what was missing or misaligned in their draft. Our findings have implications for how students approach, educators perceive, and designers support the drafting and revision process.

KW - Academic literacy

KW - Informative writing

KW - Metacognition

KW - Rereading

KW - Revision

KW - Technology

KW - Writing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961061699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961061699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10758-015-9265-5

DO - 10.1007/s10758-015-9265-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961061699

VL - 21

SP - 99

EP - 123

JO - Technology, Knowledge and Learning

JF - Technology, Knowledge and Learning

SN - 2211-1662

IS - 1

ER -