Visualizing Public Address

Cara A Finnegan, Jennifer L Jones Barbour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In his keynote address at the Seventh Biennial Public Address Conference, Martin J.Medhurst argued for the need to reconfigure public address studies, particularly with regard to doctoral training.Medhurst outlined seven types of expertise that we might cultivate in graduate students, including period expertise (training in a specific era, such as the American Revolution), textual expertise (devotion to one rich text or set of texts that warrant extended study, such as the Declaration of Independence), and genre expertise (attention to specific types of public address, such as presidential rhetoric or the rhetoric of war).5 None of Medhurst's seven categories directly engaged the question of expertise in terms of visuality, though they certainly might have. If, as Medhurst observed, Stephen E. Lucas possesses expertise in the American Revolution, then so too does Lester Olson, whose studies of "rhetorical iconography" (one of which we review here) explore the complex visual politics of the early American republic.6 In a similar vein, Medhurst's notions of "textual" and "genre" expertise might be reframed to allow for the recognition of rich visual discourses as well. The books we take up here represent a range of fields in which one might locate scholarship on the visual aspects of public address, including art history, history, literary and cultural studies, and rhetorical studies.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-505
Number of pages17
JournalRhetoric and Public Affairs
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

expertise
Students
genre
rhetoric
declaration of independence
art history
literary history
Public Address
Expertise
cultural studies
graduate
politics
discourse
Rhetoric
student
American Revolution

Cite this

Visualizing Public Address. / Finnegan, Cara A; Barbour, Jennifer L Jones.

In: Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2006, p. 489-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finnegan, Cara A ; Barbour, Jennifer L Jones. / Visualizing Public Address. In: Rhetoric and Public Affairs. 2006 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 489-505.
@article{0d01b21e7fcb4f8e908931f0c505ea18,
title = "Visualizing Public Address",
abstract = "In his keynote address at the Seventh Biennial Public Address Conference, Martin J.Medhurst argued for the need to reconfigure public address studies, particularly with regard to doctoral training.Medhurst outlined seven types of expertise that we might cultivate in graduate students, including period expertise (training in a specific era, such as the American Revolution), textual expertise (devotion to one rich text or set of texts that warrant extended study, such as the Declaration of Independence), and genre expertise (attention to specific types of public address, such as presidential rhetoric or the rhetoric of war).5 None of Medhurst's seven categories directly engaged the question of expertise in terms of visuality, though they certainly might have. If, as Medhurst observed, Stephen E. Lucas possesses expertise in the American Revolution, then so too does Lester Olson, whose studies of {"}rhetorical iconography{"} (one of which we review here) explore the complex visual politics of the early American republic.6 In a similar vein, Medhurst's notions of {"}textual{"} and {"}genre{"} expertise might be reframed to allow for the recognition of rich visual discourses as well. The books we take up here represent a range of fields in which one might locate scholarship on the visual aspects of public address, including art history, history, literary and cultural studies, and rhetorical studies.",
author = "Finnegan, {Cara A} and Barbour, {Jennifer L Jones}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1353/rap.2006.0070",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "489--505",
journal = "Rhetoric and Public Affairs",
issn = "1094-8392",
publisher = "Michigan State University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualizing Public Address

AU - Finnegan, Cara A

AU - Barbour, Jennifer L Jones

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In his keynote address at the Seventh Biennial Public Address Conference, Martin J.Medhurst argued for the need to reconfigure public address studies, particularly with regard to doctoral training.Medhurst outlined seven types of expertise that we might cultivate in graduate students, including period expertise (training in a specific era, such as the American Revolution), textual expertise (devotion to one rich text or set of texts that warrant extended study, such as the Declaration of Independence), and genre expertise (attention to specific types of public address, such as presidential rhetoric or the rhetoric of war).5 None of Medhurst's seven categories directly engaged the question of expertise in terms of visuality, though they certainly might have. If, as Medhurst observed, Stephen E. Lucas possesses expertise in the American Revolution, then so too does Lester Olson, whose studies of "rhetorical iconography" (one of which we review here) explore the complex visual politics of the early American republic.6 In a similar vein, Medhurst's notions of "textual" and "genre" expertise might be reframed to allow for the recognition of rich visual discourses as well. The books we take up here represent a range of fields in which one might locate scholarship on the visual aspects of public address, including art history, history, literary and cultural studies, and rhetorical studies.

AB - In his keynote address at the Seventh Biennial Public Address Conference, Martin J.Medhurst argued for the need to reconfigure public address studies, particularly with regard to doctoral training.Medhurst outlined seven types of expertise that we might cultivate in graduate students, including period expertise (training in a specific era, such as the American Revolution), textual expertise (devotion to one rich text or set of texts that warrant extended study, such as the Declaration of Independence), and genre expertise (attention to specific types of public address, such as presidential rhetoric or the rhetoric of war).5 None of Medhurst's seven categories directly engaged the question of expertise in terms of visuality, though they certainly might have. If, as Medhurst observed, Stephen E. Lucas possesses expertise in the American Revolution, then so too does Lester Olson, whose studies of "rhetorical iconography" (one of which we review here) explore the complex visual politics of the early American republic.6 In a similar vein, Medhurst's notions of "textual" and "genre" expertise might be reframed to allow for the recognition of rich visual discourses as well. The books we take up here represent a range of fields in which one might locate scholarship on the visual aspects of public address, including art history, history, literary and cultural studies, and rhetorical studies.

U2 - 10.1353/rap.2006.0070

DO - 10.1353/rap.2006.0070

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 489

EP - 505

JO - Rhetoric and Public Affairs

JF - Rhetoric and Public Affairs

SN - 1094-8392

IS - 3

ER -