TY - JOUR
T1 - Viscous inertial mass damper (VIMD) for seismic responses control of the coupled adjacent buildings
AU - Lu, Lei
AU - Xu, Jiaqi
AU - Zhou, Ying
AU - Lu, Wensheng
AU - Spencer, Billie F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the key projects (Grant No. 51638012). Additionally, the first author gratefully acknowledges the support of the China Scholarship Council (CSC) on his visit at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/4/15
Y1 - 2021/4/15
N2 - Many research studies have focused on a novel kind of damper involved with an inertial/gyro mass component, called the inertial mass damper (IMD). Different realizations of the IMD share common standard features: a sizeable apparent mass and the pseudo-negative dynamic stiffness. The connected control method (CCM) has been proven effective for mitigating vibration between adjacent flexible structures. This paper explores the efficacy of using an IMD in parallel with a viscous damper (termed VIMD) configured in the sky bridge to control the vibration of two adjacent towers under random earthquake excitation. First, numerical models of two buildings are developed using a Timoshenko beam model, which can accommodate both bending and shear deformation. Key damper parameters are explored through a parametric study. Then, stochastic optimization is performed to determine optimum damper parameters and the most effective configuration. The optimization results are analyzed in detail, and guidelines for the damper configuration are recommended. By comparing the optimal control performance between the VIMD and traditional viscous damper (VD), the following conclusions can be drawn: due to its pseudo-negative stiffness characteristics and large damper force, the VIMD can achieve better control performances for a wide range of the axial stiffness of the sky bridge; the VIMD requires a smaller damping coefficient and axial stiffness, which can result in smaller damper sizes and member sections of the sky bridge. Therefore, the VIMD is demonstrated to be a useful alternative for engineering practice in CCM vibration mitigation strategies.
AB - Many research studies have focused on a novel kind of damper involved with an inertial/gyro mass component, called the inertial mass damper (IMD). Different realizations of the IMD share common standard features: a sizeable apparent mass and the pseudo-negative dynamic stiffness. The connected control method (CCM) has been proven effective for mitigating vibration between adjacent flexible structures. This paper explores the efficacy of using an IMD in parallel with a viscous damper (termed VIMD) configured in the sky bridge to control the vibration of two adjacent towers under random earthquake excitation. First, numerical models of two buildings are developed using a Timoshenko beam model, which can accommodate both bending and shear deformation. Key damper parameters are explored through a parametric study. Then, stochastic optimization is performed to determine optimum damper parameters and the most effective configuration. The optimization results are analyzed in detail, and guidelines for the damper configuration are recommended. By comparing the optimal control performance between the VIMD and traditional viscous damper (VD), the following conclusions can be drawn: due to its pseudo-negative stiffness characteristics and large damper force, the VIMD can achieve better control performances for a wide range of the axial stiffness of the sky bridge; the VIMD requires a smaller damping coefficient and axial stiffness, which can result in smaller damper sizes and member sections of the sky bridge. Therefore, the VIMD is demonstrated to be a useful alternative for engineering practice in CCM vibration mitigation strategies.
KW - Damper configuration
KW - Damper parameters
KW - Pseudo-negative stiffness
KW - Stochastic performance optimization
KW - Viscous inertial mass damper (VIMD)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100381713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100381713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111876
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111876
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100381713
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 233
JO - Structural Engineering Review
JF - Structural Engineering Review
M1 - 111876
ER -