Virtue, Knowledge, and Political Instability in Aristotle's Politics: Lessons from the Eudemian Ethics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

I argue that we cannot fully understand Aristotle's position on political stability and state preservation in the Politics with paying close attention to his Eudemian Ethics. We learn from considering the Politics and the Eudemian Ethics in concert that even 'correct' regimes are unstable when citizens do not possess full virtue. Aristotle introduces his formal account of the knowledge requirements for virtue in Eudemian Ethics 8.3, and he applies these knowledge requirements as an explanation for state decline in Politics 2.9 when discussing the Spartans. If we primarily focus on the Nicomachean Ethics as Aristotle's single essential ethical work, we will not learn the lesson he intends his readers to take away from the Spartan discussion in the Politics: that virtue requires correct understanding of the hierarchy and structure of the good life. This knowledge prevents the erosion of the virtues of character and the decline of political regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-276
Number of pages16
JournalPolis
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Aristotle
  • Eudemian Ethics
  • Knowledge
  • Sparta
  • Stability
  • Virtue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Classics
  • History
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Virtue, Knowledge, and Political Instability in Aristotle's Politics: Lessons from the Eudemian Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this