VALUING FOREIGN LIVES.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Should government actors allocate scarce domestic resources to protect the lives of foreign persons? This Article argues that foreign life valuation poses distinctive psychological, philosophical, social, political, and economic challenges, and analyzes current U.S. practices of foreign life valuation in light of these challenges. After identifying multiple possible methods of foreign life valuation, we suggest that the best default valuation method would allocate domestic resources according to domestic willingness to pay to protect foreign lives.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-578
Number of pages80
JournalGeorgia Law Review
Volume48
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Economics
Psychology

Keywords

  • LIFE
  • VALUE (Economics)
  • NONCITIZENS -- United States -- Legal status, laws, etc.
  • HARM (Ethics)
  • LIFESAVING
  • RESOURCE allocation
  • CRIMINAL justice administration -- United States
  • MORAL & ethical aspects
  • SOCIAL aspects
  • ECONOMIC aspects
  • ECONOMIC conditions in the United States, 2009-2017

Cite this

VALUING FOREIGN LIVES. / Wexler, Lesley; Rowell, Kristen Arden.

In: Georgia Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 499-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{093a1bc85bb74661aadd812e639774c4,
title = "VALUING FOREIGN LIVES.",
abstract = "Should government actors allocate scarce domestic resources to protect the lives of foreign persons? This Article argues that foreign life valuation poses distinctive psychological, philosophical, social, political, and economic challenges, and analyzes current U.S. practices of foreign life valuation in light of these challenges. After identifying multiple possible methods of foreign life valuation, we suggest that the best default valuation method would allocate domestic resources according to domestic willingness to pay to protect foreign lives.",
keywords = "LIFE, VALUE (Economics), NONCITIZENS -- United States -- Legal status, laws, etc., HARM (Ethics), LIFESAVING, RESOURCE allocation, CRIMINAL justice administration -- United States, MORAL & ethical aspects, SOCIAL aspects, ECONOMIC aspects, ECONOMIC conditions in the United States, 2009-2017",
author = "Lesley Wexler and Rowell, {Kristen Arden}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "499--578",
journal = "Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)",
issn = "0016-8300",
publisher = "Georgia Law Review Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - VALUING FOREIGN LIVES.

AU - Wexler, Lesley

AU - Rowell, Kristen Arden

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Should government actors allocate scarce domestic resources to protect the lives of foreign persons? This Article argues that foreign life valuation poses distinctive psychological, philosophical, social, political, and economic challenges, and analyzes current U.S. practices of foreign life valuation in light of these challenges. After identifying multiple possible methods of foreign life valuation, we suggest that the best default valuation method would allocate domestic resources according to domestic willingness to pay to protect foreign lives.

AB - Should government actors allocate scarce domestic resources to protect the lives of foreign persons? This Article argues that foreign life valuation poses distinctive psychological, philosophical, social, political, and economic challenges, and analyzes current U.S. practices of foreign life valuation in light of these challenges. After identifying multiple possible methods of foreign life valuation, we suggest that the best default valuation method would allocate domestic resources according to domestic willingness to pay to protect foreign lives.

KW - LIFE

KW - VALUE (Economics)

KW - NONCITIZENS -- United States -- Legal status, laws, etc.

KW - HARM (Ethics)

KW - LIFESAVING

KW - RESOURCE allocation

KW - CRIMINAL justice administration -- United States

KW - MORAL & ethical aspects

KW - SOCIAL aspects

KW - ECONOMIC aspects

KW - ECONOMIC conditions in the United States, 2009-2017

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 499

EP - 578

JO - Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)

JF - Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)

SN - 0016-8300

IS - 2

ER -