Values and valuing

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Evaluators work in a world of values. Evaluating is the process of addressing normative questions about what is good/bad, effective/unsuccessful, important/unimportant, meritorious/of little worth, and so on. Evaluators render value judgments like these about policies, programs, projects, and strategies. Evaluator involvement with valuing does not end there, however. Evaluators are also professionally duty-bound to sort through value perspectives, understanding, criticizing, and justifying their choice in guiding and appraising our social actions. This chapter discusses both professional obligations. It reviews the issues entailed when evaluators aim to judge the merit, worth, or significance of social interventions, including the logic and methodologies informing those judgments and professional responsibility for making those judgments. It also discusses how valuing is at work in the choice of criteria and in evaluators' professional commitments. The chapter provides an overview of some new ways in which values and valuing are being discussed in evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Program Evaluation
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages66-83
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781803928289
ISBN (Print)9781803928272
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • Criteria
  • Evaluating
  • Logic of evaluation
  • Stakeholders
  • Values
  • Valuing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Values and valuing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this