TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of body adiposity index in predicting body fat in Brazilians adults
AU - Segheto, Wellington
AU - Coelho, France Araújo
AU - Cristina Guimarães da Silva, Danielle
AU - Hallal, Pedro Curi
AU - Marins, João Carlos Bouzas
AU - Ribeiro, Andreia Queiroz
AU - Pessoa, Milene Cristine
AU - Morais, Sílvia Helena O.
AU - Longo, Giana Zarbato
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil), the Bioclin—Quibasa, the Supermarket of the Federal University of Viçosa, and the Academy Aquatic Center. The authors also thank to all undergraduate research fellows and volunteers who contributed to the data collection, the technical Division of Health of the Federal University of Viçosa, responsible for biochemical analysis and all study volunteers who agreed to participate in this survey. W. Segheto participated on the definition of the research question, design of the study, collection, and analysis of the data and article write-up. D. C. G. da Silva, F. A. Coelho, and S. H. O. Morais R. Morais collaborated on the literature review, data collection, and write-up the article. P. C Hallal, J. C. B. Marins, A. Q. Ribeiro, and M. C. Pessoa contributed analyses and interpretation of the results, writing of the article, and approval of the final version. G. Z. Longo contributed to the planning of the study, the training of the fieldwork team, analysis and interpretation of data, wrote the article, and revised the final version
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare various methods of assessing body compositions with body adiposity index (BAI) and to identify the validity of BAI as a predictor of body fat in Brazilian adults. Methods: This study included 706 individuals (average age 37.3 years, SD = 12.1). Anthropometric data included percent body fat obtained by skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance analysis and DXA. Body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio, and BAI were calculated. The correlation between variables was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the Bland–Altman and Kaplan Meier graphic approaches were used to verify the agreement between BAI and DXA. Results: There was a strong correlation between BAI and BMI (r = 0.84 in men and r = 0.86 in women, P <.001), waist circumference (r = 0.77 in men and r = 0.75 in women, P <.001) percent fat by skinfold thicknesses (r = 0.71 in men and r = 0.71 in women, P <.001) and by DXA (r = 0.72 in men and r = 0.78 in women, P <.001). The Bland–Altman approach showed an overestimation of BAI in males and an underestimation in women using DXA as the reference method. The agreement between BAI and DXA through the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 41%. Conclusions: It was found that BAI does not replace other measurements of body fat, but compared with more complex methods can be an alternative for estimating the body fat in the absence of these methods.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare various methods of assessing body compositions with body adiposity index (BAI) and to identify the validity of BAI as a predictor of body fat in Brazilian adults. Methods: This study included 706 individuals (average age 37.3 years, SD = 12.1). Anthropometric data included percent body fat obtained by skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance analysis and DXA. Body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio, and BAI were calculated. The correlation between variables was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the Bland–Altman and Kaplan Meier graphic approaches were used to verify the agreement between BAI and DXA. Results: There was a strong correlation between BAI and BMI (r = 0.84 in men and r = 0.86 in women, P <.001), waist circumference (r = 0.77 in men and r = 0.75 in women, P <.001) percent fat by skinfold thicknesses (r = 0.71 in men and r = 0.71 in women, P <.001) and by DXA (r = 0.72 in men and r = 0.78 in women, P <.001). The Bland–Altman approach showed an overestimation of BAI in males and an underestimation in women using DXA as the reference method. The agreement between BAI and DXA through the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 41%. Conclusions: It was found that BAI does not replace other measurements of body fat, but compared with more complex methods can be an alternative for estimating the body fat in the absence of these methods.
KW - adults
KW - body adiposity index
KW - obesity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982943789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982943789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajhb.22901
DO - 10.1002/ajhb.22901
M3 - Article
C2 - 27502080
AN - SCOPUS:84982943789
SN - 1042-0533
VL - 29
JO - American Journal of Human Biology
JF - American Journal of Human Biology
IS - 1
M1 - e22901
ER -