TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilizing intensive monitoring and simulations for identifying sources of phosphorus and sediment and for directing, siting, and assessing BMPs
T2 - The Genesee River example
AU - Makarewicz, J. C.
AU - Lewis, T. W.
AU - Winslow, M.
AU - Rea, E.
AU - Dressel, L.
AU - Pettenski, D.
AU - Snyder, B. J.
AU - Richards, P.
AU - Zollweg, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 International Association for Great Lakes Research.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - An assessment of sediment and phosphorus concentrations and load, identification of phosphorus allocation and sources, and the effectiveness of management practices on the main stem (Upper Genesee River, Lower Genesee River) and on the four major Genesee tributaries (Canaseraga, Honeoye, Black, and Oatka Creeks) were conducted. The P load allocation analysis indicated that 60% of the total phosphorus load to Lake Ontario was due to anthropogenic sources and that only 40% was due to natural sources. With a P load of 412,505 kg P/yr, the Genesee River carries the second highest load, after the Niagara River, to Lake Ontario. Such a large P load of anthropogenic origin suggested that a managed reduction in P loss from the Genesee watershed is possible. SWAT was employed to test the effectiveness of best management practices (BMPs) on land use and to determine the minimum potential phosphorus concentration expected in the subcatchments. Simulations of BMPs on both point and nonpoint sources indicated that phosphorus could effectively be maintained within the watershed and out of Lake Ontario, where elevated phosphorus stimulates algae production and is implicated in beach closings in the Rochester Embayment AOC. Using our most effective simulated scenario of grassed waterways and upgrading of wastewater treatment plants to tertiary treatment, a 32.9% (135,714 kg P/yr) reduction in P loading to the nearshore of Lake Ontario was predicted. With this reduction in P, concentrations of 65 μg P/L, which is within the debated target goal of 65 μg TP/L in NYS, were also predicted.
AB - An assessment of sediment and phosphorus concentrations and load, identification of phosphorus allocation and sources, and the effectiveness of management practices on the main stem (Upper Genesee River, Lower Genesee River) and on the four major Genesee tributaries (Canaseraga, Honeoye, Black, and Oatka Creeks) were conducted. The P load allocation analysis indicated that 60% of the total phosphorus load to Lake Ontario was due to anthropogenic sources and that only 40% was due to natural sources. With a P load of 412,505 kg P/yr, the Genesee River carries the second highest load, after the Niagara River, to Lake Ontario. Such a large P load of anthropogenic origin suggested that a managed reduction in P loss from the Genesee watershed is possible. SWAT was employed to test the effectiveness of best management practices (BMPs) on land use and to determine the minimum potential phosphorus concentration expected in the subcatchments. Simulations of BMPs on both point and nonpoint sources indicated that phosphorus could effectively be maintained within the watershed and out of Lake Ontario, where elevated phosphorus stimulates algae production and is implicated in beach closings in the Rochester Embayment AOC. Using our most effective simulated scenario of grassed waterways and upgrading of wastewater treatment plants to tertiary treatment, a 32.9% (135,714 kg P/yr) reduction in P loading to the nearshore of Lake Ontario was predicted. With this reduction in P, concentrations of 65 μg P/L, which is within the debated target goal of 65 μg TP/L in NYS, were also predicted.
KW - Genesee River
KW - Lake Ontario
KW - Management
KW - Phosphorus
KW - SWAT
KW - Water Quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940447682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940447682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2015.06.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84940447682
SN - 0380-1330
VL - 41
SP - 743
EP - 759
JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research
JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research
IS - 3
ER -