TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilization of Water Utility Lime Sludge for Flue Gas Desulfurization in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Part I. Supply–Demand Evaluation and Life Cycle Assessment
AU - Salih, Hafiz Hussein Mohamed
AU - Patterson, Craig
AU - Li, Jiaxing
AU - Dastgheib, Seyed Abolfazl
N1 - Funding Information:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, through its Pathfinder Innovation Program, funded and collaborated in the research described herein. This work has been subjected to the Agency’s administrative review and has been approved for external publication. Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency; therefore, no official endorsement should be inferred. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Chemical Society.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6/21
Y1 - 2018/6/21
N2 - The feasibility of lime-softening sludge utilization for flue gas desulfurization in coal-fired power plants was evaluated through a supply–demand analysis and a life cycle assessment (LCA). To evaluate the demand and supply of lime sludge to replace limestone on a national scale, the annual amount of lime sludge generated by water treatment utilities in the United States was estimated and compared with the annual amount of limestone used by coal-fired power utilities. To evaluate the environmental sustainability of reusing lime sludge in power plants, an LCA study was performed in which the environmental impact and water footprint of the proposed approach were quantified, and these results were compared with the conventional approaches for limestone mining, grinding, and transportation to power plants and lime sludge disposal in landfills. Water utilities across the United States are currently generating approximately 3.2 million tons of lime sludge per year at an estimated disposal cost of approximately US$90 million, whereas power utilities are using approximately 6.3 million tons of limestone per year. The potential savings that would result from partial replacement of limestone with lime sludge was estimated to be approximately US$97 million per year. The LCA study showed that the environmental impact of lime sludge utilization in power plants under different scenarios was 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of the landfill disposal option. Furthermore, the water footprint for lime sludge reuse in power plants was almost negligible compared with that of the conventional approaches of disposing of lime sludge at water utilities or using limestone at power utilities.
AB - The feasibility of lime-softening sludge utilization for flue gas desulfurization in coal-fired power plants was evaluated through a supply–demand analysis and a life cycle assessment (LCA). To evaluate the demand and supply of lime sludge to replace limestone on a national scale, the annual amount of lime sludge generated by water treatment utilities in the United States was estimated and compared with the annual amount of limestone used by coal-fired power utilities. To evaluate the environmental sustainability of reusing lime sludge in power plants, an LCA study was performed in which the environmental impact and water footprint of the proposed approach were quantified, and these results were compared with the conventional approaches for limestone mining, grinding, and transportation to power plants and lime sludge disposal in landfills. Water utilities across the United States are currently generating approximately 3.2 million tons of lime sludge per year at an estimated disposal cost of approximately US$90 million, whereas power utilities are using approximately 6.3 million tons of limestone per year. The potential savings that would result from partial replacement of limestone with lime sludge was estimated to be approximately US$97 million per year. The LCA study showed that the environmental impact of lime sludge utilization in power plants under different scenarios was 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of the landfill disposal option. Furthermore, the water footprint for lime sludge reuse in power plants was almost negligible compared with that of the conventional approaches of disposing of lime sludge at water utilities or using limestone at power utilities.
KW - Flue gas desulfurization, limestone, lime sludge, life cycle assessment, environmental impact assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047511088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047511088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00823
DO - 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00823
M3 - Article
SN - 0887-0624
VL - 32
SP - 6627
EP - 6633
JO - Energy & Fuels
JF - Energy & Fuels
IS - 6
ER -