TY - JOUR
T1 - Using regional climate projections to guide grassland community restoration in the face of climate change
AU - Kane, Kristin
AU - Debinski, Diane M.
AU - Anderson, Chris
AU - Scasta, John D.
AU - Engle, David M.
AU - Miller, James R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The project described in this publication was supported by Grant No. [G12AC20504] from the United States Geological Survey to CA and DD. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the North Central CSC or the USGS. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the United States We would like to thank Ryan Harr of Iowa Department of Natural Resources for contributing Figure 1. We would also like to thank Brian Wilsey and Deb Lewis for providing data on species distributions in Iowa.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Kane, Debinski, Anderson, Scasta, Engle and Miller.
PY - 2017/5/9
Y1 - 2017/5/9
N2 - Grassland loss has been extensive worldwide, endangering the associated biodiversity and human well-being that are both dependent on these ecosystems. Ecologists have developed approaches to restore grassland communities and many have been successful, particularly where soils are rich, precipitation is abundant, and seeds of native plant species can be obtained. However, climate change adds a new filter needed in planning grassland restoration efforts. Potential responses of species to future climate conditions must also be considered in planning for long-termresilience. We demonstrate this methodology using a site-specific model and a maximum entropy approach to predict changes in habitat suitability for 33 grassland plant species in the tallgrass prairie region of the U.S. using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios A1B and A2. The A1B scenario predicts an increase in temperature from 1.4 to 6.4◦ C, whereas the A2 scenario predicts temperature increases from 2 to 5.4◦ C and much greater CO2 emissions than the A1B scenario. Both scenarios predict these changes to occur by the year 2100. Model projections for 2040 under the A1B scenario predict that all but three modeled species will lose ∼90% of their suitable habitat. Then by 2080, all species except for one will lose ∼90% of their suitable habitat. Models run using the A2 scenario predict declines in habitat for just four species by 2040, but models predict that by 2080, habitat suitability will decline for all species. The A2 scenario appears based on our results to be the less severe climate change scenario for our species. Our results demonstrate that many common species, including grasses, forbs, and shrubs, are sensitive to climate change. Thus, grassland restoration alternatives should be evaluated based upon the long-term viability in the context of climate change projections and risk of plant species loss.
AB - Grassland loss has been extensive worldwide, endangering the associated biodiversity and human well-being that are both dependent on these ecosystems. Ecologists have developed approaches to restore grassland communities and many have been successful, particularly where soils are rich, precipitation is abundant, and seeds of native plant species can be obtained. However, climate change adds a new filter needed in planning grassland restoration efforts. Potential responses of species to future climate conditions must also be considered in planning for long-termresilience. We demonstrate this methodology using a site-specific model and a maximum entropy approach to predict changes in habitat suitability for 33 grassland plant species in the tallgrass prairie region of the U.S. using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios A1B and A2. The A1B scenario predicts an increase in temperature from 1.4 to 6.4◦ C, whereas the A2 scenario predicts temperature increases from 2 to 5.4◦ C and much greater CO2 emissions than the A1B scenario. Both scenarios predict these changes to occur by the year 2100. Model projections for 2040 under the A1B scenario predict that all but three modeled species will lose ∼90% of their suitable habitat. Then by 2080, all species except for one will lose ∼90% of their suitable habitat. Models run using the A2 scenario predict declines in habitat for just four species by 2040, but models predict that by 2080, habitat suitability will decline for all species. The A2 scenario appears based on our results to be the less severe climate change scenario for our species. Our results demonstrate that many common species, including grasses, forbs, and shrubs, are sensitive to climate change. Thus, grassland restoration alternatives should be evaluated based upon the long-term viability in the context of climate change projections and risk of plant species loss.
KW - Climate change
KW - Grasslands
KW - Maxent
KW - Restoration
KW - Species distribution models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019206285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019206285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpls.2017.00730
DO - 10.3389/fpls.2017.00730
M3 - Article
C2 - 28536591
AN - SCOPUS:85019206285
SN - 1664-462X
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Plant Science
JF - Frontiers in Plant Science
M1 - 730
ER -