TY - JOUR
T1 - Using cover crops in headlands of organic grain farms
T2 - Effects on soil properties, weeds and crop yields
AU - Welch, Rachel Y.
AU - Behnke, Gevan D.
AU - Davis, Adam S.
AU - Masiunas, John
AU - Villamil, María B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this project was provided by The Ceres Trust : Organic Research Initiative http://cerestrust.org/ Award 2011-01385. We are also indebted to the USDA National Needs Fellowship Program for supporting Mss. Welch in her master studies within the context of this study http://www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/nationalneedsgraduatefellowships.cfm Award ILLU-538-632. Additionally, we are grateful to our collaborating farmers for hosting our research plots, Mr. Dan Anderson and Dr. Emerson Nafziger for their invaluable insights, and the many graduate and undergraduate students at the University of Illinois Sustainable Systems Lab for their help in field and lab assignments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/1/15
Y1 - 2016/1/15
N2 - Organic producers often rely heavily on tillage for weed management, which can create compaction, especially in headlands, and favor weed growth. To address Illinois organic grain farmers' concerns, we explored the effect of cover crops in headland areas of their farms on soil properties, weeds, and yields in a participatory on-farm approach. A split-plot arrangement with two replications at each of four Illinois locations was used in two consecutive years within field areas [FA: headlands - or turn-rows - HL; non-headlands NHL] randomly selected as main plots where four cover crop treatments were randomly assigned (CC: fallow control C; forage radish FR; mix of forage radish and buckwheat FRbw; and mix of forage radish with hairy vetch and cereal rye FRhvr). Collaborating farmers planted soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in 2012 and corn (Zea mays L.) in 2013. Each fall and spring, we measured soil penetration resistance (PR), bulk density (BD), water aggregate stability (WAS), total carbon (TC), nitrate (N-NO3), ammonium (N-NH4), available phosphorus (P), and pH. Additionally, cover crop and weed growth, and cash crop yields were determined each year. Our results indicate HL areas had greater PR (+22%) and BD (+3%), as well as higher WAS (+4%), TC (+10%), P (+36%), and pH (+7%) in comparison to NHL areas on average through the fall and spring seasons. Though FRhvr significantly reduced spring weed biomass (-30%) compared to the controls, higher density of grass weeds (+44%) were present in HL areas through spring and summer regardless of CC treatments. Due to the resilient nature of these particular Illinois soils and extreme weather pattern observations, the cover crop treatments did not alleviate compaction nor influence soil properties for the duration of this project. However, there was a trend toward lower available P in the FRhvr treatments and reduced crop yields in those treatments within the NHL areas. Though the cover crop treatments chosen for this trial did not seem to provide clear benefits, our results point toward a beneficial feedback between the weed community and the soil properties within headland areas in these organic systems.
AB - Organic producers often rely heavily on tillage for weed management, which can create compaction, especially in headlands, and favor weed growth. To address Illinois organic grain farmers' concerns, we explored the effect of cover crops in headland areas of their farms on soil properties, weeds, and yields in a participatory on-farm approach. A split-plot arrangement with two replications at each of four Illinois locations was used in two consecutive years within field areas [FA: headlands - or turn-rows - HL; non-headlands NHL] randomly selected as main plots where four cover crop treatments were randomly assigned (CC: fallow control C; forage radish FR; mix of forage radish and buckwheat FRbw; and mix of forage radish with hairy vetch and cereal rye FRhvr). Collaborating farmers planted soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in 2012 and corn (Zea mays L.) in 2013. Each fall and spring, we measured soil penetration resistance (PR), bulk density (BD), water aggregate stability (WAS), total carbon (TC), nitrate (N-NO3), ammonium (N-NH4), available phosphorus (P), and pH. Additionally, cover crop and weed growth, and cash crop yields were determined each year. Our results indicate HL areas had greater PR (+22%) and BD (+3%), as well as higher WAS (+4%), TC (+10%), P (+36%), and pH (+7%) in comparison to NHL areas on average through the fall and spring seasons. Though FRhvr significantly reduced spring weed biomass (-30%) compared to the controls, higher density of grass weeds (+44%) were present in HL areas through spring and summer regardless of CC treatments. Due to the resilient nature of these particular Illinois soils and extreme weather pattern observations, the cover crop treatments did not alleviate compaction nor influence soil properties for the duration of this project. However, there was a trend toward lower available P in the FRhvr treatments and reduced crop yields in those treatments within the NHL areas. Though the cover crop treatments chosen for this trial did not seem to provide clear benefits, our results point toward a beneficial feedback between the weed community and the soil properties within headland areas in these organic systems.
KW - Compaction
KW - Cover cropping
KW - Grain crop yield
KW - Midwest agriculture
KW - Organic farms
KW - Soil properties
KW - Turn rows
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945268915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945268915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84945268915
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 216
SP - 322
EP - 332
JO - Agro-Ecosystems
JF - Agro-Ecosystems
ER -