Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support Climate Action Planning (CAP)

Haozhi Pan, Jessica Page, Le Zhang, Si Chen, Cong Cong, Georgia Destouni, Zahra Kalantari, Brian M Deal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We present a comparative socio-ecological modeling approach to identify possible improvement opportunities for Climate Action Plans (CAPs), focusing on two cities, Chicago and Stockholm. The aim is to provide a tool for capturing and addressing deep-rooted behavioral and institutional preferences that may aggravate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cities. Socio-economic activities, land use change, and future urban forms are considered and forecast to the year 2040 on 30m × 30m spatial grids. GHG emissions associated with these urban development aspects are calculated and compared between the cities. Innovative policy instruments for growth control and zoning (GCZ) are simulated and tested through the socio-ecological model, to determine their effectiveness when added to other interventions included in the CAPs. Our findings show that behavioral/institutional preference for sprawl, its low-density form, and resultant carbon sink losses are main factors driving current and future residential and transportation GHG emissions in Chicago. GCZ policies are shown to counteract and mitigate around 20% of these factors in the form of future GHG emissions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-42
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume232
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 20 2019

Fingerprint

ecological modeling
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas
Planning
Zoning
action plan
climate
zoning policy
carbon sink
Land use
economic activity
urban development
zoning
land use change
Economics
Carbon
planning
Climate
Greenhouse gas emissions

Keywords

  • Climate action planning
  • Comparative urban study
  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Land use
  • Socio-ecological modeling
  • Urban planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support Climate Action Planning (CAP). / Pan, Haozhi; Page, Jessica; Zhang, Le; Chen, Si; Cong, Cong; Destouni, Georgia; Kalantari, Zahra; Deal, Brian M.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 232, 20.09.2019, p. 30-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pan, Haozhi ; Page, Jessica ; Zhang, Le ; Chen, Si ; Cong, Cong ; Destouni, Georgia ; Kalantari, Zahra ; Deal, Brian M. / Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support Climate Action Planning (CAP). In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019 ; Vol. 232. pp. 30-42.
@article{620e4fca1ff64892837d88fbc35a8225,
title = "Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support Climate Action Planning (CAP)",
abstract = "We present a comparative socio-ecological modeling approach to identify possible improvement opportunities for Climate Action Plans (CAPs), focusing on two cities, Chicago and Stockholm. The aim is to provide a tool for capturing and addressing deep-rooted behavioral and institutional preferences that may aggravate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cities. Socio-economic activities, land use change, and future urban forms are considered and forecast to the year 2040 on 30m × 30m spatial grids. GHG emissions associated with these urban development aspects are calculated and compared between the cities. Innovative policy instruments for growth control and zoning (GCZ) are simulated and tested through the socio-ecological model, to determine their effectiveness when added to other interventions included in the CAPs. Our findings show that behavioral/institutional preference for sprawl, its low-density form, and resultant carbon sink losses are main factors driving current and future residential and transportation GHG emissions in Chicago. GCZ policies are shown to counteract and mitigate around 20{\%} of these factors in the form of future GHG emissions.",
keywords = "Climate action planning, Comparative urban study, Greenhouse gas emissions, Land use, Socio-ecological modeling, Urban planning",
author = "Haozhi Pan and Jessica Page and Le Zhang and Si Chen and Cong Cong and Georgia Destouni and Zahra Kalantari and Deal, {Brian M}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.274",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "232",
pages = "30--42",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support Climate Action Planning (CAP)

AU - Pan, Haozhi

AU - Page, Jessica

AU - Zhang, Le

AU - Chen, Si

AU - Cong, Cong

AU - Destouni, Georgia

AU - Kalantari, Zahra

AU - Deal, Brian M

PY - 2019/9/20

Y1 - 2019/9/20

N2 - We present a comparative socio-ecological modeling approach to identify possible improvement opportunities for Climate Action Plans (CAPs), focusing on two cities, Chicago and Stockholm. The aim is to provide a tool for capturing and addressing deep-rooted behavioral and institutional preferences that may aggravate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cities. Socio-economic activities, land use change, and future urban forms are considered and forecast to the year 2040 on 30m × 30m spatial grids. GHG emissions associated with these urban development aspects are calculated and compared between the cities. Innovative policy instruments for growth control and zoning (GCZ) are simulated and tested through the socio-ecological model, to determine their effectiveness when added to other interventions included in the CAPs. Our findings show that behavioral/institutional preference for sprawl, its low-density form, and resultant carbon sink losses are main factors driving current and future residential and transportation GHG emissions in Chicago. GCZ policies are shown to counteract and mitigate around 20% of these factors in the form of future GHG emissions.

AB - We present a comparative socio-ecological modeling approach to identify possible improvement opportunities for Climate Action Plans (CAPs), focusing on two cities, Chicago and Stockholm. The aim is to provide a tool for capturing and addressing deep-rooted behavioral and institutional preferences that may aggravate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cities. Socio-economic activities, land use change, and future urban forms are considered and forecast to the year 2040 on 30m × 30m spatial grids. GHG emissions associated with these urban development aspects are calculated and compared between the cities. Innovative policy instruments for growth control and zoning (GCZ) are simulated and tested through the socio-ecological model, to determine their effectiveness when added to other interventions included in the CAPs. Our findings show that behavioral/institutional preference for sprawl, its low-density form, and resultant carbon sink losses are main factors driving current and future residential and transportation GHG emissions in Chicago. GCZ policies are shown to counteract and mitigate around 20% of these factors in the form of future GHG emissions.

KW - Climate action planning

KW - Comparative urban study

KW - Greenhouse gas emissions

KW - Land use

KW - Socio-ecological modeling

KW - Urban planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066984037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066984037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.274

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.274

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066984037

VL - 232

SP - 30

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -