Using attribution theory to examine community rehabilitation provider stigma

David Ross Strauser, Ayse Ciftci, Deirdre O'Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study builds on existing research investigating the stigma-reducing strategies specific to rehabilitation service providers by comparing differences in education levels and degree of contact among rehabilitation service providers. Rehabilitation service providers with master's level and bachelor level education showed significant differences in their stigmatizing tendencies on subscales of controllability and stability for different categories of disabilities. Specifically, service providers with a master's degree had more stigmatizing beliefs for psychosis and cocaine addiction, compared with service providers with a bachelor's degree. Service providers with either a bachelor's degree or master's degree reported lower levels of stigma overall for five of the six categories of disability compared with their community college student counterparts. No differences were found for length of time working with persons with psychiatric disabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-47
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Keywords

  • Attribution theory
  • Controllability
  • Psychiatric disabilities
  • Stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using attribution theory to examine community rehabilitation provider stigma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this