TY - CONF
T1 - Using an artificial neural network to predict pig mass from depth images
AU - Condotta, I. C.F.S.
AU - Brown-Brandl, T. M.
AU - Sousa, R. V.
AU - Silva-Miranda, K. O.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The author would like to thank John Holman, Dale Janssen, and Hannah Speer for their help in collecting data and Donna Griess for her help in editing this manuscript. This research was funded in part by USDA, Agricultural Research Service; The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)-Brazil and by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)-Brazil.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Automating the acquisition of animals’ mass would aid the producers by providing information about animals’ mass gain and marketing pigs at the correct mass. Previous image processing methods have an estimated error of 4.6%. The objective of this paper is to test different modeling methods to decrease the error associated with the mass prediction. Seven hundred and seventy-two depth images and masses were collected from a population of grow–finish pigs (equally divided between barrows and gilts and three commercial sire-lines – Landrance, Duroc, Yorkshire); four ages (8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks) were sampled. An artificial neural network (ANN) based-model was created and simulated in several realizations, to fine-tune its parameters using the supervised learning approach. The input variables to the model included body volume, dorsal area, average height, neck to tail length, hip width, shoulders width and last rib width. A cross-validation method was used with three different training, validation and testing protocols – 70% training, 15% validation and 15% testing. Training data were selected to ensure every age, sex, and sire-line were represented. The performance of these models was evaluated by comparing the predicted and measured pig mass using the linear regression parameters – the slope, the intercept, the mean error, the root mean square error (RMSE), and the determination coefficient (R2). The proposed ANN-based model showed a good performance on mass prediction tasks compared with a classical MLR-based model, and demonstrated a better capacity for persistent performance on previously unseen data.
AB - Automating the acquisition of animals’ mass would aid the producers by providing information about animals’ mass gain and marketing pigs at the correct mass. Previous image processing methods have an estimated error of 4.6%. The objective of this paper is to test different modeling methods to decrease the error associated with the mass prediction. Seven hundred and seventy-two depth images and masses were collected from a population of grow–finish pigs (equally divided between barrows and gilts and three commercial sire-lines – Landrance, Duroc, Yorkshire); four ages (8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks) were sampled. An artificial neural network (ANN) based-model was created and simulated in several realizations, to fine-tune its parameters using the supervised learning approach. The input variables to the model included body volume, dorsal area, average height, neck to tail length, hip width, shoulders width and last rib width. A cross-validation method was used with three different training, validation and testing protocols – 70% training, 15% validation and 15% testing. Training data were selected to ensure every age, sex, and sire-line were represented. The performance of these models was evaluated by comparing the predicted and measured pig mass using the linear regression parameters – the slope, the intercept, the mean error, the root mean square error (RMSE), and the determination coefficient (R2). The proposed ANN-based model showed a good performance on mass prediction tasks compared with a classical MLR-based model, and demonstrated a better capacity for persistent performance on previously unseen data.
KW - Image analysis
KW - Kinect® sensor
KW - Mass prediction
KW - Precision livestock farming
KW - Swine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084096280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084096280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13031/iles.ILES18-043
DO - 10.13031/iles.ILES18-043
M3 - Paper
T2 - 10th International Livestock Environment Symposium, ILES 2018
Y2 - 25 September 2018 through 27 September 2018
ER -