TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of water decision-support tools for drought management
AU - Fanok, Lily
AU - Beltrán, Bray J.
AU - Burnham, Morey
AU - Wardropper, Chloe B.
N1 - This research was supported by McIntire Stennis award #1015330; a travel award from the Rangeland Center, University of Idaho; and travel awards from the College of Natural Resources and College of Graduate Studies, University of Idaho. These funders had no role in study design, data collection, or the manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge the High Divide Collaborative for their partnership.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Climate is changing in ways that may significantly affect the provision of hydrologic ecosystem services in arid or semi-arid regions. To answer this challenge, there has been an effort to increase the adaptive capacity of organizations that manage water and the land-uses water supports. Governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) managing large landscapes in the United States Northern Rockies region have access to a variety of water decision-support tools, such as indicators of precipitation and snowpack, which could increase their adaptive capacity to manage hydrologic ecosystem services under changing conditions. Yet little is known about the use of decision-support tools in this region and how tools could be improved. With the aim of informing future tool development and addressing information-use gaps, we conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of federal and state agencies and NGOs to 1) identify which tools are being used, 2) describe tool-supported management actions across different types of organizations, and 3) determine “usability” criteria managers consider when adopting a climate tool. Through qualitative analysis, we found multiple types of tools being used, including processes and frameworks, data and models, and geospatial or web-based tools. We also identified several criteria that study participants used to assess whether or not to use a tool within their organization, including tool accuracy, robustness, extendibility, interpretability, capacity, and institutional fit. This study suggests that increased communication between tool developers and end-users, with a focus on tools’ relevance and ability to support management actions, could improve tools and increase the adaptive capacity of users. This research also points to the need for multiple lines of future research including how to improve the fit between organizational goals and water tools.
AB - Climate is changing in ways that may significantly affect the provision of hydrologic ecosystem services in arid or semi-arid regions. To answer this challenge, there has been an effort to increase the adaptive capacity of organizations that manage water and the land-uses water supports. Governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) managing large landscapes in the United States Northern Rockies region have access to a variety of water decision-support tools, such as indicators of precipitation and snowpack, which could increase their adaptive capacity to manage hydrologic ecosystem services under changing conditions. Yet little is known about the use of decision-support tools in this region and how tools could be improved. With the aim of informing future tool development and addressing information-use gaps, we conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives of federal and state agencies and NGOs to 1) identify which tools are being used, 2) describe tool-supported management actions across different types of organizations, and 3) determine “usability” criteria managers consider when adopting a climate tool. Through qualitative analysis, we found multiple types of tools being used, including processes and frameworks, data and models, and geospatial or web-based tools. We also identified several criteria that study participants used to assess whether or not to use a tool within their organization, including tool accuracy, robustness, extendibility, interpretability, capacity, and institutional fit. This study suggests that increased communication between tool developers and end-users, with a focus on tools’ relevance and ability to support management actions, could improve tools and increase the adaptive capacity of users. This research also points to the need for multiple lines of future research including how to improve the fit between organizational goals and water tools.
KW - Climate change
KW - Decision-support tools
KW - Drought management
KW - Human dimensions of water
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123861518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123861518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127531
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127531
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123861518
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 607
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
M1 - 127531
ER -