TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of an anatomic marking form as an alternative to the Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Person Surgery
AU - Knight, Napoleon
AU - Aucar, John
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background: The Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery was approved by the Joint Commission Board of Commissioners in July 2003 and became effective July 1, 2004. It requires the performance of a preprocedural verification process, marking of the procedure site, and performing a "time out" immediately before the start of a procedure. Compliance with the Universal Protocol requirements remains cumbersome because of the inherent characteristics of the surgical work flow process. Methods By working directly with the Joint Commission, their medical staff, perioperative nursing staff, and members of the hospital quality department, the authors were able to develop an innovative anatomic marking form, which serves as a surrogate for marking patients. Results The marking form has been used on 112,500 patients over 4.5 years, with a single implementation error that led to minimal patient harm. Conclusion This article describes the development of the anatomic marking form and the practical implications the process has on patient safety.
AB - Background: The Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, Wrong Person Surgery was approved by the Joint Commission Board of Commissioners in July 2003 and became effective July 1, 2004. It requires the performance of a preprocedural verification process, marking of the procedure site, and performing a "time out" immediately before the start of a procedure. Compliance with the Universal Protocol requirements remains cumbersome because of the inherent characteristics of the surgical work flow process. Methods By working directly with the Joint Commission, their medical staff, perioperative nursing staff, and members of the hospital quality department, the authors were able to develop an innovative anatomic marking form, which serves as a surrogate for marking patients. Results The marking form has been used on 112,500 patients over 4.5 years, with a single implementation error that led to minimal patient harm. Conclusion This article describes the development of the anatomic marking form and the practical implications the process has on patient safety.
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Sentinel event
KW - Universal Protocol
KW - Wrong-site surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650226359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650226359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.010
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 21146024
AN - SCOPUS:78650226359
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 200
SP - 803
EP - 809
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -