Abstract
Purpose: Usability studies are a form of library evaluation that are often passed off as research. However, at its core, usability is an evaluation method, not a research method. The goal is to make an argument that usability studies can be a valid form of scholarly research if certain limitations inherent in usability studies are addressed in the research design. Design/methodology/approach: Through evaluating literature in the social sciences, this paper makes an argument for usability as a research method if certain limitations inherent within usability testing are addressed. Findings: Usability is not only an evaluation method, but when limitations are addressed; it can be considered an important research tool within libraries. Originality/value: No other article in the library and information sciences literature talks about methodologies for usability. Most usability articles do not address methodologies utilized in a way that would be considered research in a broader social sciences context. This article bridges the gap from when usability is considered evaluation to when it is considered research within library science.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 204-217 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | OCLC Systems and Services |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Limitations
- Qualitative research
- Quantitative research
- Research methods
- Usability testing
- User-centred design
- Web site evaluation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems
- Education
- Library and Information Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Usability testing in libraries: Methods, limitations, and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS